Systematic Review of Computational Methods for Cervical Cancer Detection

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women, especially in developing countries, and early detection is vital for effective treatment and improved survival. Several machine learning methods have been used for diagnosis; however, a systematic review is needed to understand progress in predictive outcomes and the challenges of applying computer-aided diagnosis in healthcare settings. This review, conducted using PRISMA guidelines, examines studies on machine learning and deep learning techniques used for cervical cancer detection, with the goal of identifying their strengths and weaknesses to support future research and practical use in healthcare. Peer-reviewed articles were selected from Google Scholar and PubMed using search terms such as “cervical cancer,” “machine learning,” “deep learning,” “classification,” “prediction,” and “detection,” and studies were included or excluded based on predefined criteria. Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 18 focused on deep learning. Deep learning models achieved accuracy, AUC, and F1 scores ranging from 77% to 99%, consistently outperforming other machine learning methods, which had scores between 61% and 99%. Overall, deep learning methods have demonstrated higher accuracy in detecting cervical cancer; however, future studies should validate these models using larger and more diverse datasets to improve reliability and clinical relevance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18508316
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Review of Computational Methods for Cervical Cancer Detection

Samuel G. Armato, Rahman Mukaila Alade, Benjamin Aribisala, Olufunmilayo Olopade et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
AI in cancer detection
article

Systematic Review of Computational Methods for Cervical Cancer Detection

Samuel G. Armato, Rahman Mukaila Alade, Benjamin Aribisala, Olufunmilayo Olopade, Sefiyat Oyiza Salami-Ohida, Adewale Opeoluwa Ogunde, Oluwatoyin Ayokule Enikuomehin
article en

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women, especially in developing countries, and early detection is vital for effective treatment and improved survival. Several machine learning methods have been used for diagnosis; however, a systematic review is needed to understand progress in predictive outcomes and the challenges of applying computer-aided diagnosis in healthcare settings. This review, conducted using PRISMA guidelines, examines studies on machine learning and deep learning techniques used for cervical cancer detection, with the goal of identifying their strengths and weaknesses to support future research and practical use in healthcare. Peer-reviewed articles were selected from Google Scholar and PubMed using search terms such as “cervical cancer,” “machine learning,” “deep learning,” “classification,” “prediction,” and “detection,” and studies were included or excluded based on predefined criteria. Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 18 focused on deep learning. Deep learning models achieved accuracy, AUC, and F1 scores ranging from 77% to 99%, consistently outperforming other machine learning methods, which had scores between 61% and 99%. Overall, deep learning methods have demonstrated higher accuracy in detecting cervical cancer; however, future studies should validate these models using larger and more diverse datasets to improve reliability and clinical relevance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.