Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence into Urological Practice: A Cross‐Sectional Survey Analysis from the EAU Endourology

Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly impacted health care, notably within the field of urology, where generative AI presents opportunities to enhance patient education, streamline clinical workflows, and support research activities. This prospective, cross-sectional study systematically investigated the adoption of generative AI among urology professionals, exploring usage patterns, perceived benefits, and barriers to broader implementation. The survey was developed by an expert panel from the Endourology Section of the European Association of Urology and collaborators from the Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions. Utilizing a structured survey disseminated internationally, the study collected responses from 243 urology professionals, predominantly specialists and mid-career practitioners from Europe, Latin America, and Asia. Findings indicate substantial engagement with generative AI, with approximately 53% of respondents reporting prior experience using AI tools in clinical practice. Patient education emerged as the most favored application, highlighted by 55% of respondents within the patient interaction category. Clinical decision-making, particularly treatment recommendations (44%), and research support (18%) were other key areas of usage. However, 82% of participants expressed concerns regarding the technical reliability of generative AI, and 76% worried about diagnostic errors. Notably, about 25% of respondents felt no health care functions should be entirely replaced by AI, emphasizing its role as complementary to human expertise rather than a substitute. Primary barriers identified included inadequate training (20%), technical limitations (14%), and insufficient empirical evidence validating effectiveness (12%). Addressing these barriers through targeted training, rigorous validation, and clear regulatory frameworks is essential for fully realizing AI’s potential in urological practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-290625
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence into Urological Practice: A Cross‐Sectional Survey Analysis from the EAU Endourology

Felipe Pauchard, Etienne-Xavier Keller, Jia-Lun Kwok, Catalina Prieto Solano et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence into Urological Practice: A Cross‐Sectional Survey Analysis from the EAU Endourology

Felipe Pauchard, Etienne-Xavier Keller, Jia-Lun Kwok, Catalina Prieto Solano, Frédéric Panthier, Vineet Gauhar, Alba Sierra Del Rio, Alexandre Danilovic, Olivier Traxer, Nick Tarazona, Bhaskar K Somani, Mariela Corrales
article en

Abstract

Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly impacted health care, notably within the field of urology, where generative AI presents opportunities to enhance patient education, streamline clinical workflows, and support research activities. This prospective, cross-sectional study systematically investigated the adoption of generative AI among urology professionals, exploring usage patterns, perceived benefits, and barriers to broader implementation. The survey was developed by an expert panel from the Endourology Section of the European Association of Urology and collaborators from the Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions. Utilizing a structured survey disseminated internationally, the study collected responses from 243 urology professionals, predominantly specialists and mid-career practitioners from Europe, Latin America, and Asia. Findings indicate substantial engagement with generative AI, with approximately 53% of respondents reporting prior experience using AI tools in clinical practice. Patient education emerged as the most favored application, highlighted by 55% of respondents within the patient interaction category. Clinical decision-making, particularly treatment recommendations (44%), and research support (18%) were other key areas of usage. However, 82% of participants expressed concerns regarding the technical reliability of generative AI, and 76% worried about diagnostic errors. Notably, about 25% of respondents felt no health care functions should be entirely replaced by AI, emphasizing its role as complementary to human expertise rather than a substitute. Primary barriers identified included inadequate training (20%), technical limitations (14%), and insufficient empirical evidence validating effectiveness (12%). Addressing these barriers through targeted training, rigorous validation, and clear regulatory frameworks is essential for fully realizing AI’s potential in urological practice.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.