The knowledge of ethical AI decision-making: A behavioral economics perspective

Focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) ethics and behavioral economics, this paper demonstrates how integrating behavioral insights can inform ethical guidelines for AI-based systems. Recent developments conceptualize AI as a key to critical sectors such as finance, marketing, and healthcare, thereby prompting a widespread recognition of its potential to reinforce or mitigate societal biases. However, while AI ethics has emphasized technical concerns such as data fairness and algorithmic transparency, insights from behavioral economics remain largely untapped. To bridge this gap in the literature, the present study uses a three-stage methodology. First, a sys tematic literature review (SLR) is conducted to identify gaps in AI ethics frameworks and to establish how key behavioral economic principles can enhance transparent decision making. Second, in-depth interviews are performed to collect additional insights and to compare how the results compare with those obtained from the SLR. Third, a topic modeling-based model, latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), supported by the Computer-Assisted Text Analysis (CATA) framework, is applied to the collected interview corpus in order to identify the main topics in the data. The results reveal that ethical AI is increasingly understood by professionals not only as a technical issue but also as a behavioral and organizational one. Specifically, we identify five main topics from the inter view content, namely Data & transparency, Behavioral insights & design, Legal/ethical frameworks, Imple mentation challenges & infrastructure, and Civic/stakeholder engagement. The first three of these topics dominate in the current discourse on AI decision making. The results also reveal that cognitive biases, such as anchoring and confirmation bias, affect the data that feed AI algorithms and user interaction with AI-driven outputs. If these biases remain unaddressed, they can amplify ethical risks. However, awareness of such pat terns can inform practical design and governance strategies so as to improve transparency, fairness, and user engagement. Finally, based on the findings, four research proposals are advanced to clarify how behavioral economics can be systematically integrated into ethical AI decision making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.100967
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The knowledge of ethical AI decision-making: A behavioral economics perspective

Álvaro Hernández-Tamurejo, Astrida Miceikienė, Rita Bužinskienė, José Ramón Saura
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The knowledge of ethical AI decision-making: A behavioral economics perspective

Álvaro Hernández-Tamurejo, Astrida Miceikienė, Rita Bužinskienė, José Ramón Saura
article en

Abstract

Focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) ethics and behavioral economics, this paper demonstrates how integrating behavioral insights can inform ethical guidelines for AI-based systems. Recent developments conceptualize AI as a key to critical sectors such as finance, marketing, and healthcare, thereby prompting a widespread recognition of its potential to reinforce or mitigate societal biases. However, while AI ethics has emphasized technical concerns such as data fairness and algorithmic transparency, insights from behavioral economics remain largely untapped. To bridge this gap in the literature, the present study uses a three-stage methodology. First, a sys tematic literature review (SLR) is conducted to identify gaps in AI ethics frameworks and to establish how key behavioral economic principles can enhance transparent decision making. Second, in-depth interviews are performed to collect additional insights and to compare how the results compare with those obtained from the SLR. Third, a topic modeling-based model, latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), supported by the Computer-Assisted Text Analysis (CATA) framework, is applied to the collected interview corpus in order to identify the main topics in the data. The results reveal that ethical AI is increasingly understood by professionals not only as a technical issue but also as a behavioral and organizational one. Specifically, we identify five main topics from the inter view content, namely Data & transparency, Behavioral insights & design, Legal/ethical frameworks, Imple mentation challenges & infrastructure, and Civic/stakeholder engagement. The first three of these topics dominate in the current discourse on AI decision making. The results also reveal that cognitive biases, such as anchoring and confirmation bias, affect the data that feed AI algorithms and user interaction with AI-driven outputs. If these biases remain unaddressed, they can amplify ethical risks. However, awareness of such pat terns can inform practical design and governance strategies so as to improve transparency, fairness, and user engagement. Finally, based on the findings, four research proposals are advanced to clarify how behavioral economics can be systematically integrated into ethical AI decision making.

Journal of Innovation & KnowledgeVol. 14
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.