The effects of graded tasks on physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This review establishes the extent to which the behaviour change technique (BCT) Graded Tasks is effective in increasing physical activity. Databases, including PubMed, Cochrane and PsycINFO, were searched (October 2024) for randomised control trials of Graded Tasks interventions with adult physical activity change as the main outcome. Graded Tasks were always delivered alongside BCTs 'goal setting (behaviour)' and 'action planning'. Of the 53 identified studies (<i>N</i> = 10,060), 39 were included in a random effects meta-analysis, indicating a significant, medium effect of Graded Tasks interventions in increasing physical activity (<i>N</i> = 4190, <i>g</i> = 0.61, CI 95% 0.42-0.81, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>I<sup>2 </sup>= </i> 83%). Prevention-based interventions (<i>g</i> = 0.78, CI 95% 0.43-1.12, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>I<sup>2 </sup></i>= 90%) had larger effects than treatment-based interventions (<i>g</i> = 0.38, CI 95% 0.23-0.53, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>I<sup>2 </sup></i>= 34). The number of Graded Task increments explained significant variability in physical activity change (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.47, <i>β</i> = 0.68, <i>p</i> < .001). GRADE certainty of evidence was rated low. Graded Tasks, in conjunction with other BCTs, are effective for increasing physical activity, particularly for prevention. The included studies did, however, show high heterogeneity and potential publication bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022347300.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Psychology Review
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2026.2618195
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of graded tasks on physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Christopher J. Armitage, Katie Newby, Katherine Brown, Neil Howlett et al.
Health Psychology Review
Physical Activity and Health
article

The effects of graded tasks on physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Christopher J. Armitage, Katie Newby, Katherine Brown, Neil Howlett, Tracy Epton, Susan Gibson
article en

Abstract

This review establishes the extent to which the behaviour change technique (BCT) Graded Tasks is effective in increasing physical activity. Databases, including PubMed, Cochrane and PsycINFO, were searched (October 2024) for randomised control trials of Graded Tasks interventions with adult physical activity change as the main outcome. Graded Tasks were always delivered alongside BCTs 'goal setting (behaviour)' and 'action planning'. Of the 53 identified studies (<i>N</i> = 10,060), 39 were included in a random effects meta-analysis, indicating a significant, medium effect of Graded Tasks interventions in increasing physical activity (<i>N</i> = 4190, <i>g</i> = 0.61, CI 95% 0.42-0.81, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>I<sup>2 </sup>= </i> 83%). Prevention-based interventions (<i>g</i> = 0.78, CI 95% 0.43-1.12, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>I<sup>2 </sup></i>= 90%) had larger effects than treatment-based interventions (<i>g</i> = 0.38, CI 95% 0.23-0.53, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>I<sup>2 </sup></i>= 34). The number of Graded Task increments explained significant variability in physical activity change (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.47, <i>β</i> = 0.68, <i>p</i> < .001). GRADE certainty of evidence was rated low. Graded Tasks, in conjunction with other BCTs, are effective for increasing physical activity, particularly for prevention. The included studies did, however, show high heterogeneity and potential publication bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022347300.

Health Psychology Review
University of Hertfordshire (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.