Different chick processing holding devices reveal welfare and stress effects via novel down-feather biomarkers

Infrared beak treatment (IRBT) and s.c. vaccinations are often performed on the Poultry Services Processor (PSP) or Hatchling Support System (HSS). The PSP includes a holding device (HD) where the jaw rests and plastic 'feet' close around the head. The HSS has a modified HD, reduced feet load station pressure, and cradle for body support. The original feet design (F1) was amended for increased head space (F2), and they are interchangeable between HD types. This study tested three HD configurations (treatments (trt)): PSP with F1 (PSP-F1), PSP with F2 (PSP-F2), or HSS with F2 (HSS-F2) at a commercial hatchery. Chicks (120 Lohmann LSL-Lite (W) and 120 Lohmann Brown (B)) underwent standard processing before trt. To isolate HD effects, birds were not IRBT or vaccinated. Heart rate was tested pre- and post-trt. Surface body temperature (SBT), tonic immobility, and disorientation were measured post-trt. Blood was collected post-trt, chicks were euthanized, and down feathers collected to assess heat shock proteins (HSP60, 70, 90), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) mRNA expression via real-time quantitative PCR. The M. complexus and fascia at the occipital crest were scored for bruising. Data were analyzed as a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement with a two-way ANOVA. Heart rate did not differ between HD or strain. Chicks in W-PSP-F1 were more disoriented than all strain-HD trt, and PSP-F1 were more fearful and had the lowest SBT. Head bruising was highest on W chick M. complexus and B chick fascia. In down feathers, HSP60 was higher in PSP-F2 vs PSP-F1; HSP70 was highest in B vs W chicks. TNFα expression was higher in W-PSP-F1 and W-PSP-F2 than W-HSS-F2. Blood biomarkers, except HSP70, demonstrated interactions between HD and strain. The HSS-F2 resulted in improved welfare, and data suggest that adjustments be made for chick head size differences. This study is the first to identify a non-invasive method for measuring stress and inflammatory biomarkers in chick down feathers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2026.106595
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different chick processing holding devices reveal welfare and stress effects via novel down-feather biomarkers

AG Van Kessel, K. Schwean-Lardner, T. Shynkaruk, Susantha Gomis et al.
Poultry Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Different chick processing holding devices reveal welfare and stress effects via novel down-feather biomarkers

AG Van Kessel, K. Schwean-Lardner, T. Shynkaruk, Susantha Gomis, S. Jhetam, Kailyn Buchynski, K. Gesy, C.A.B. Adler, T.G. Crowe, S. Dridi
article en

Abstract

Infrared beak treatment (IRBT) and s.c. vaccinations are often performed on the Poultry Services Processor (PSP) or Hatchling Support System (HSS). The PSP includes a holding device (HD) where the jaw rests and plastic 'feet' close around the head. The HSS has a modified HD, reduced feet load station pressure, and cradle for body support. The original feet design (F1) was amended for increased head space (F2), and they are interchangeable between HD types. This study tested three HD configurations (treatments (trt)): PSP with F1 (PSP-F1), PSP with F2 (PSP-F2), or HSS with F2 (HSS-F2) at a commercial hatchery. Chicks (120 Lohmann LSL-Lite (W) and 120 Lohmann Brown (B)) underwent standard processing before trt. To isolate HD effects, birds were not IRBT or vaccinated. Heart rate was tested pre- and post-trt. Surface body temperature (SBT), tonic immobility, and disorientation were measured post-trt. Blood was collected post-trt, chicks were euthanized, and down feathers collected to assess heat shock proteins (HSP60, 70, 90), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) mRNA expression via real-time quantitative PCR. The M. complexus and fascia at the occipital crest were scored for bruising. Data were analyzed as a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement with a two-way ANOVA. Heart rate did not differ between HD or strain. Chicks in W-PSP-F1 were more disoriented than all strain-HD trt, and PSP-F1 were more fearful and had the lowest SBT. Head bruising was highest on W chick M. complexus and B chick fascia. In down feathers, HSP60 was higher in PSP-F2 vs PSP-F1; HSP70 was highest in B vs W chicks. TNFα expression was higher in W-PSP-F1 and W-PSP-F2 than W-HSS-F2. Blood biomarkers, except HSP70, demonstrated interactions between HD and strain. The HSS-F2 resulted in improved welfare, and data suggest that adjustments be made for chick head size differences. This study is the first to identify a non-invasive method for measuring stress and inflammatory biomarkers in chick down feathers.

Poultry ScienceVol. 105(5)
University of Saskatchewan (CA), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Mitacs
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.