Photon-counting detector vs. cone-beam CT in endodontics: a study of simulated endodontic conditions, treatments, and associated complications.

Objective To assess the diagnostic performance of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at dose-matched radiation levels (high, standard, and low) for detecting and evaluating simulated endodontic conditions, treatments, and associated complications.Methods Sixteen extracted third molars with eight endodontic tasks were imaged using PCD-CT and CBCT. Qualitative (image quality, artifact susceptibility, diagnostic interpretability) and quantitative (endodontic working length) parameters were assessed by two observers using a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and weighted kappa (κ) were used for data analysis.Results High- and standard-dose PCD-CT demonstrated superior image quality and anatomical visualization compared to CBCT (median 5, IQR 5-5; κ = 1.0; all p < 0.001). Low-dose PCD-CT remained diagnostically robust, outperforming CBCT, except in root canal visualization, where both performed similarly. Diagnostic accuracy of pathologies and complications was slightly higher with PCD-CT (80-88%) than with CBCT (75-88%). Endodontic working length measurements were consistently accurate across all protocols, with near-perfect inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.84-0.86, all p < 0.001).Conclusions PCD-CT demonstrated superior diagnostic performance over CBCT across multiple endodontic tasks, particularly at high and standard doses. Even at low doses, PCD-CT maintained robust accuracy and image quality, outperforming dose-matched CBCT in most parameters. Endodontic working length assessment was equally reliable across both modalities. Overall, PCD-CT offers diagnostic advantages over CBCT, particularly in challenging cases involving complex anatomy or high-density materials. Its effective performance at lower radiation levels emphasizes its clinical potential and supports broader implementation in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/94328
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Photon-counting detector vs. cone-beam CT in endodontics: a study of simulated endodontic conditions, treatments, and associated complications.

Silvio Valdec, Egon Burian, Nadin Al‐Haj Husain, Tristan T. Demmert et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Photon-counting detector vs. cone-beam CT in endodontics: a study of simulated endodontic conditions, treatments, and associated complications.

Silvio Valdec, Egon Burian, Nadin Al‐Haj Husain, Tristan T. Demmert, Bernd Stadlinger, Harald Essig, Selinay Dogan, Adib Al-Haj Husain, Victor Mergen, Hatem Alkadhi, Thomas Flohr, Sebastian Winklhofer
article en

Abstract

Objective To assess the diagnostic performance of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at dose-matched radiation levels (high, standard, and low) for detecting and evaluating simulated endodontic conditions, treatments, and associated complications.Methods Sixteen extracted third molars with eight endodontic tasks were imaged using PCD-CT and CBCT. Qualitative (image quality, artifact susceptibility, diagnostic interpretability) and quantitative (endodontic working length) parameters were assessed by two observers using a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and weighted kappa (κ) were used for data analysis.Results High- and standard-dose PCD-CT demonstrated superior image quality and anatomical visualization compared to CBCT (median 5, IQR 5-5; κ = 1.0; all p < 0.001). Low-dose PCD-CT remained diagnostically robust, outperforming CBCT, except in root canal visualization, where both performed similarly. Diagnostic accuracy of pathologies and complications was slightly higher with PCD-CT (80-88%) than with CBCT (75-88%). Endodontic working length measurements were consistently accurate across all protocols, with near-perfect inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.84-0.86, all p < 0.001).Conclusions PCD-CT demonstrated superior diagnostic performance over CBCT across multiple endodontic tasks, particularly at high and standard doses. Even at low doses, PCD-CT maintained robust accuracy and image quality, outperforming dose-matched CBCT in most parameters. Endodontic working length assessment was equally reliable across both modalities. Overall, PCD-CT offers diagnostic advantages over CBCT, particularly in challenging cases involving complex anatomy or high-density materials. Its effective performance at lower radiation levels emphasizes its clinical potential and supports broader implementation in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
University of Dental Medicine (MM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.