3675 Therapists’ perspectives on a new structured tailored approach to rehabilitation after hip fragility fracture—the stratify feasibility randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background The stratify feasibility randomised controlled trial explored a risk-stratified rehabilitation intervention, where patients with hip fracture were categorised as low, medium, or high risk of poor outcome and received tailored interventions accordingly. This qualitative study aimed to understand therapists’ views on the acceptability of the approach, as well as barriers and facilitators to its implementation, to inform a future definitive trial. Methods Following delivery of the intervention, all therapists took part in semi-structured interviews. The topic guide and deductive thematic analysis were informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, the Theoretical Domains Framework, and fidelity domains (delivery, receipt, and enactment). Results Nine therapists (n = 5 physiotherapists, n = 4 occupational therapists) participated in interviews. All viewed the approach as acceptable and expressed positive attitudes towards the intervention. Key enablers included alignment with professional roles, permission to dedicate time to appropriate therapeutic activities of daily living, confidence in delivering the intervention, and optimism about its benefits. Reported barriers included limited time due to staffing and length of stay, challenges engaging participants in emotionally distressing circumstances, and the need for a consultee to support decision-making and goal setting, particularly in the high-risk subgroup. Conclusion The Stratify approach was acceptable to therapists. Key facilitators and barriers to implementation were identified to inform a future trial on the effectiveness of the approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf368.129
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3675 Therapists’ perspectives on a new structured tailored approach to rehabilitation after hip fragility fracture—the stratify feasibility randomised controlled trial

Emma Godfrey, R. H. T. Edwards, Rhian Milton-Cole, Julie C. Whitney et al.
Age and Ageing
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

3675 Therapists’ perspectives on a new structured tailored approach to rehabilitation after hip fragility fracture—the stratify feasibility randomised controlled trial

Emma Godfrey, R. H. T. Edwards, Rhian Milton-Cole, Julie C. Whitney, J. E. Adams, C Sackley, N E Foster, S Guerra, A F Montague, C Surman, S Ayis, F C Martin, A Goubar, K J Sheehan, I D Cameron, N E Walsh, C L Gregson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The stratify feasibility randomised controlled trial explored a risk-stratified rehabilitation intervention, where patients with hip fracture were categorised as low, medium, or high risk of poor outcome and received tailored interventions accordingly. This qualitative study aimed to understand therapists’ views on the acceptability of the approach, as well as barriers and facilitators to its implementation, to inform a future definitive trial. Methods Following delivery of the intervention, all therapists took part in semi-structured interviews. The topic guide and deductive thematic analysis were informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, the Theoretical Domains Framework, and fidelity domains (delivery, receipt, and enactment). Results Nine therapists (n = 5 physiotherapists, n = 4 occupational therapists) participated in interviews. All viewed the approach as acceptable and expressed positive attitudes towards the intervention. Key enablers included alignment with professional roles, permission to dedicate time to appropriate therapeutic activities of daily living, confidence in delivering the intervention, and optimism about its benefits. Reported barriers included limited time due to staffing and length of stay, challenges engaging participants in emotionally distressing circumstances, and the need for a consultee to support decision-making and goal setting, particularly in the high-risk subgroup. Conclusion The Stratify approach was acceptable to therapists. Key facilitators and barriers to implementation were identified to inform a future trial on the effectiveness of the approach.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(Supplement_1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.