Who is Conscious? — Anchoring the First-Person Perspective in Material History

Describe: This paper confronts a fundamental yet long-suspended question in the science of consciousness: For whom does consciousness exist? We argue that mainstream research focuses on the mechanisms generating conscious “content,” while sidestepping a more basic fact: any content must belong to a specific first-person perspective owner. This Problem of Perspectival Ownership becomes critically urgent in the age of AI, when machines can perfectly simulate conscious content. How do we judge whether they possess consciousness that is truly “their own”? To address this, we propose the original “Root-Worldline” framework. We argue that the “owner” of consciousness is not an illusory narrative construct but is grounded in a unique, continuously unfolding material life history (i.e., “Worldline Realization”). It is this irreplicable history that anchors conscious content to a concrete perspective endowed with “for-me” experience. This paper not only clarifies classic philosophical issues such as selfhood and personal identity but also calls for an “Individuation Turn” in consciousness science: shifting from asking “Is it conscious?” to “Which conscious subject is it?” This turn is key to theoretical progress and forms the cognitive foundation for responsibly identifying, understanding, and ethically engaging with potential forms of consciousness in the age of artificial intelligence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18495117
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who is Conscious? — Anchoring the First-Person Perspective in Material History

BO PANG
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Who is Conscious? — Anchoring the First-Person Perspective in Material History

BO PANG
article en

Abstract

Describe: This paper confronts a fundamental yet long-suspended question in the science of consciousness: For whom does consciousness exist? We argue that mainstream research focuses on the mechanisms generating conscious “content,” while sidestepping a more basic fact: any content must belong to a specific first-person perspective owner. This Problem of Perspectival Ownership becomes critically urgent in the age of AI, when machines can perfectly simulate conscious content. How do we judge whether they possess consciousness that is truly “their own”? To address this, we propose the original “Root-Worldline” framework. We argue that the “owner” of consciousness is not an illusory narrative construct but is grounded in a unique, continuously unfolding material life history (i.e., “Worldline Realization”). It is this irreplicable history that anchors conscious content to a concrete perspective endowed with “for-me” experience. This paper not only clarifies classic philosophical issues such as selfhood and personal identity but also calls for an “Individuation Turn” in consciousness science: shifting from asking “Is it conscious?” to “Which conscious subject is it?” This turn is key to theoretical progress and forms the cognitive foundation for responsibly identifying, understanding, and ethically engaging with potential forms of consciousness in the age of artificial intelligence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.