Standardization of Legal Terminology within Linguistic Expertise

This article examines the normalization of the terminological thesaurus of modern jurisprudence and the methodology of linguistic expert identification of signs of an attack on the subjective rights of an individual. Modern legislation, regulating the commission of verbal offenses, is distinguished by the national marking of the relevant dispositions. Using the example of slander under Belarusian national legislation, the need to adjust certain legislative provisions is consistently proved. In particular, the concepts of “honor” and “dignity” are differentiated, which are often considered synonymous in legal practice. Furthermore, the meaning of the category “business reputation” is detailed based on the broad meaning of the attribute. Clarification of these concepts allowed us to parameterize a conflict-generating text containing potentially slanderous information: the linguistic features of the designated verbal offense include a) factuality, b) object composition, c) type of information; extralinguistic, d) information dissemination channel. Thus an algorithm for conducting a specialized forensic linguistic examination is determined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331625602130
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardization of Legal Terminology within Linguistic Expertise

A. A. Lavitski
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

Standardization of Legal Terminology within Linguistic Expertise

A. A. Lavitski
article en

Abstract

This article examines the normalization of the terminological thesaurus of modern jurisprudence and the methodology of linguistic expert identification of signs of an attack on the subjective rights of an individual. Modern legislation, regulating the commission of verbal offenses, is distinguished by the national marking of the relevant dispositions. Using the example of slander under Belarusian national legislation, the need to adjust certain legislative provisions is consistently proved. In particular, the concepts of “honor” and “dignity” are differentiated, which are often considered synonymous in legal practice. Furthermore, the meaning of the category “business reputation” is detailed based on the broad meaning of the attribute. Clarification of these concepts allowed us to parameterize a conflict-generating text containing potentially slanderous information: the linguistic features of the designated verbal offense include a) factuality, b) object composition, c) type of information; extralinguistic, d) information dissemination channel. Thus an algorithm for conducting a specialized forensic linguistic examination is determined.

Herald of the Russian Academy of SciencesVol. 95(3)
Vitebsk State University named after P.M. Masherov (BY), Vitebsk State Medical University (BY), International University MITSO (BY)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Standardization of Legal Terminology within Linguistic Expertise — A. A. Lavitski · Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS