Striking for a Just Transition? North American Auto Unions and the Electric Vehicle Transition

ABSTRACT Decarbonization heightens risks for workers, but union strategies shape how these risks are managed and whether new jobs offer quality employment. This paper compares U.S. and Canadian auto unions during the 2023 Detroit Three bargaining, focusing on strategic capacities and internal politics to explain their divergent responses to the EV transition. Both unions emphasized a just transition and secured significant gains through the negotiations. However, the UAW's militancy emerged as a compensatory mechanism for weakened capacity, while Unifor's traditional approach stemmed from organizational resilience. We argue that understanding this counter‐intuitive relationship between capacity and militancy is critical to understanding cross‐national differences in labor's climate strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.70024
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Striking for a Just Transition? North American Auto Unions and the Electric Vehicle Transition

D. S. Park, Mathieu Dupuis, Ian Greer
Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Striking for a Just Transition? North American Auto Unions and the Electric Vehicle Transition

D. S. Park, Mathieu Dupuis, Ian Greer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Decarbonization heightens risks for workers, but union strategies shape how these risks are managed and whether new jobs offer quality employment. This paper compares U.S. and Canadian auto unions during the 2023 Detroit Three bargaining, focusing on strategic capacities and internal politics to explain their divergent responses to the EV transition. Both unions emphasized a just transition and secured significant gains through the negotiations. However, the UAW's militancy emerged as a compensatory mechanism for weakened capacity, while Unifor's traditional approach stemmed from organizational resilience. We argue that understanding this counter‐intuitive relationship between capacity and militancy is critical to understanding cross‐national differences in labor's climate strategies.

Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society
Cornell University (US), New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations (US), Université Laval (CA), Columbia University (US)
Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture, David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future , Cornell University, Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.