Detecting aberrant p53 immunohistochemical expression patterns in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using artificial intelligence

PurposeImmunohistochemistry (IHC) for the tumor suppressor protein p53 is an adjunct biomarker for Barrett’s esophagus (BE)-related dysplasia classification and risk stratification. Four phenotypic staining patterns are distinguished: wild-type (WT), representing normal staining, and three aberrant patterns: overexpression (OE), null mutation (NM), and double clone (DC). OE is readily recognized; NM and DC are harder to identify and often overlooked. This diagnostic challenge leads to variation in patient treatment because DC is associated with higher progression rates. An AI tool could improve diagnostic accuracy and patient risk stratification.ApproachWe compared two AI approaches discriminating p53 patterns: a full biopsy (FB) approach and a clustering-constrained-attention multiple-instance learning (CLAM) approach. Because DC is rare, we adopted a double-binary strategy (CLAM-DB, FB-DB) that predicts OE and NM separately, and we introduced synthetic DC (CLAM + SynDC) by combining OE and NM patterns to boost DC performance. DC cases were excluded from training and used only for testing.ResultsFor aberrant versus non-aberrant expression, all models performed similarly (AUC 0.94 to 0.96). For four-class p53 IHC (WT, OE, NM, DC), CLAM-based models consistently outperformed FB models in overall accuracy. CLAM + SynDC and CLAM-DB outperformed baseline CLAM (0.84, 0.84 versus 0.71), whereas combining DB and SynDC did not yield further gains.ConclusionDouble-binary training enabled robust recognition of DC despite its absence during training, underscoring the value of disentangling OE and NM signals. Overall, AI can provide a standardized and clinically relevant aid for interpreting p53 IHC in BE and supporting patient risk stratification. Code is available at GitHub https://github.com/qurAI-amsterdam/BE_p53_classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Imaging
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmi.13.1.017503
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting aberrant p53 immunohistochemical expression patterns in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using artificial intelligence

Chella R. S. van der Post, Lindsey Oudijk, C I Sanchez, Luuk Verheijen et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Detecting aberrant p53 immunohistochemical expression patterns in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using artificial intelligence

Chella R. S. van der Post, Lindsey Oudijk, C I Sanchez, Luuk Verheijen, Hoel Kervadec, Hans Halfwerk, Myrtle van der Wel, Michel Botros, Onno J de Boer, E J B Bekkers, Fiebo J. C. ten Kate, Lodewijk A. A. Brosens, Sybren L. Meijer
article en

Abstract

PurposeImmunohistochemistry (IHC) for the tumor suppressor protein p53 is an adjunct biomarker for Barrett’s esophagus (BE)-related dysplasia classification and risk stratification. Four phenotypic staining patterns are distinguished: wild-type (WT), representing normal staining, and three aberrant patterns: overexpression (OE), null mutation (NM), and double clone (DC). OE is readily recognized; NM and DC are harder to identify and often overlooked. This diagnostic challenge leads to variation in patient treatment because DC is associated with higher progression rates. An AI tool could improve diagnostic accuracy and patient risk stratification.ApproachWe compared two AI approaches discriminating p53 patterns: a full biopsy (FB) approach and a clustering-constrained-attention multiple-instance learning (CLAM) approach. Because DC is rare, we adopted a double-binary strategy (CLAM-DB, FB-DB) that predicts OE and NM separately, and we introduced synthetic DC (CLAM + SynDC) by combining OE and NM patterns to boost DC performance. DC cases were excluded from training and used only for testing.ResultsFor aberrant versus non-aberrant expression, all models performed similarly (AUC 0.94 to 0.96). For four-class p53 IHC (WT, OE, NM, DC), CLAM-based models consistently outperformed FB models in overall accuracy. CLAM + SynDC and CLAM-DB outperformed baseline CLAM (0.84, 0.84 versus 0.71), whereas combining DB and SynDC did not yield further gains.ConclusionDouble-binary training enabled robust recognition of DC despite its absence during training, underscoring the value of disentangling OE and NM signals. Overall, AI can provide a standardized and clinically relevant aid for interpreting p53 IHC in BE and supporting patient risk stratification. Code is available at GitHub https://github.com/qurAI-amsterdam/BE_p53_classification.

Journal of Medical ImagingVol. 13(01)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Isala (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Maag Lever Darm Stichting
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.