Environmental and societal costs of maize production decrease by addressing the uncertainty in nitrogen rate recommendations

Excessive crop nitrogen (N) fertilization has negative environmental and social consequences. Using maize grain yield response to nitrogen field trials, we consider the uncertainty surrounding N rate recommendations to demonstrate that fertilizer N rates can be reduced by 12─16% in the US Corn Belt, with negligible risk of maize yield losses. This reduction in N fertilizer applications decrease N<sub>2</sub>O-N emissions by 10% and N leaching by 13%, leading to a social benefit of 230─$530 M, due to enhanced air and water quality. Additional N reductions could benefit ecosystems and human health. However, the high risk of yield loss associated with additional N reductions makes this practice unacceptable for farmers. This emphasizes the need for incentive programs that consider the responsibilities and limitations of all actors along the food supply chain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68988-y
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental and societal costs of maize production decrease by addressing the uncertainty in nitrogen rate recommendations

Eric A. Davidson, Trevor J. Hefley, Alison J. Eagle, Ignacio Antonio Ciampitti et al.
Nature Communications
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
article

Environmental and societal costs of maize production decrease by addressing the uncertainty in nitrogen rate recommendations

Eric A. Davidson, Trevor J. Hefley, Alison J. Eagle, Ignacio Antonio Ciampitti, Hannah Birge, Jeffrey R. Schussler, Kaiyu Guan, Francisco Palmero, P. V. Vara Prasad
article en

Abstract

Excessive crop nitrogen (N) fertilization has negative environmental and social consequences. Using maize grain yield response to nitrogen field trials, we consider the uncertainty surrounding N rate recommendations to demonstrate that fertilizer N rates can be reduced by 12─16% in the US Corn Belt, with negligible risk of maize yield losses. This reduction in N fertilizer applications decrease N<sub>2</sub>O-N emissions by 10% and N leaching by 13%, leading to a social benefit of 230─$530 M, due to enhanced air and water quality. Additional N reductions could benefit ecosystems and human health. However, the high risk of yield loss associated with additional N reductions makes this practice unacceptable for farmers. This emphasizes the need for incentive programs that consider the responsibilities and limitations of all actors along the food supply chain.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
The Nature Conservancy (US), Environmental Defense Fund (US), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Kansas State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), National Center for Supercomputing Applications (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Environmental and societal costs of maize production decrease by addressing the uncertainty in nitrogen rate recommendations — Eric A. Davidson, Trevor J. Hefley, et al. · Nature Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS