Recruitment prior to conception for pregnancy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This review provides a quantitative synthesis of recruitment and retention patterns in preconception research, addressing a critical but understudied period to improve maternal and child health. We found that participant characteristics, recruitment strategy, and study design substantially influence recruitment rates, preconception attrition, and pregnancy retention, with important implications for feasibility assessment, anticipated loss to follow-up, and sample size estimation. Our findings highlight the need for recruitment of diverse populations and methodological tools tailored to preconception research. These findings offer empirically grounded parameters to support the design of more efficient, inclusive, and adequately powered preconception and pregnancy-related studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2026.01.035
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recruitment prior to conception for pregnancy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jasmine X Kiley, Edward Mullins, Catherine Aiken, Rebecca M. Reynolds et al.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Recruitment prior to conception for pregnancy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jasmine X Kiley, Edward Mullins, Catherine Aiken, Rebecca M. Reynolds, Frances Elizabeth Cates, Emma Mitchell-Sparke
article en

Abstract

This review provides a quantitative synthesis of recruitment and retention patterns in preconception research, addressing a critical but understudied period to improve maternal and child health. We found that participant characteristics, recruitment strategy, and study design substantially influence recruitment rates, preconception attrition, and pregnancy retention, with important implications for feasibility assessment, anticipated loss to follow-up, and sample size estimation. Our findings highlight the need for recruitment of diverse populations and methodological tools tailored to preconception research. These findings offer empirically grounded parameters to support the design of more efficient, inclusive, and adequately powered preconception and pregnancy-related studies.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Tufts University (US), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), The Queen's Medical Research Institute (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recruitment prior to conception for pregnancy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis — Jasmine X Kiley, Edward Mullins, et al. · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS