Lunar month intervals at Monte Alban, 496 to 221 BCE, and later Mesoamerican lunar day counts

Many Mesoamerican hieroglyphic texts bear dates in indigenous calendars. Hundreds include dates in a lunation: the most ancient, in Zapotec texts, were observational; the most numerous, in Mayan texts, in a formal lunar calendar. Many Mayan lunar dates were projections into the past or future. Previous research has suggested evidence for specific computing ratios of days to months for such projections; that of 11,960 days to 405 lunations has long been accepted as the quintessential Mayan model for such calculations. This paper addresses observational evidence available to Mesoamerican calendar specialists for developing such models. It uses Lowry’s corpus of lunar first appearances at Monte Alban (650 to 0 BCE) to determine which sequences would have stood out as most reliable observationally, shows that a ratio of 1447 days to 49 months would have been by far the most reliable, and provides circumstantial evidence for its use in Mayan calendrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00218286251388652
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lunar month intervals at Monte Alban, 496 to 221 BCE, and later Mesoamerican lunar day counts

John S. Justeson, Justin Lowry
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Lunar month intervals at Monte Alban, 496 to 221 BCE, and later Mesoamerican lunar day counts

John S. Justeson, Justin Lowry
article en

Abstract

Many Mesoamerican hieroglyphic texts bear dates in indigenous calendars. Hundreds include dates in a lunation: the most ancient, in Zapotec texts, were observational; the most numerous, in Mayan texts, in a formal lunar calendar. Many Mayan lunar dates were projections into the past or future. Previous research has suggested evidence for specific computing ratios of days to months for such projections; that of 11,960 days to 405 lunations has long been accepted as the quintessential Mayan model for such calculations. This paper addresses observational evidence available to Mesoamerican calendar specialists for developing such models. It uses Lowry’s corpus of lunar first appearances at Monte Alban (650 to 0 BCE) to determine which sequences would have stood out as most reliable observationally, shows that a ratio of 1447 days to 49 months would have been by far the most reliable, and provides circumstantial evidence for its use in Mayan calendrics.

Journal for the History of AstronomyVol. 57(1)
University at Albany, State University of New York (US), SUNY Plattsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.