Field Presence and the Performance of Environmental Projects: Evidence from the Global Environment Facility

Abstract Scant attention has been paid to how field presence shapes the implementation of environment-earmarked projects by international organizations (IOs), such as those funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). GEF funding is based on a process whereby implementing IOs and recipient partners co-design projects based on GEF criteria. Once approved by GEF, projects are implemented with no direct GEF involvement, but are later evaluated by a dedicated GEF unit. We assume that IO country officials are key players in project implementation processes, and we expect that their field presence shapes implementation performance. Drawing on data from approximately 1,000 GEF projects delivered by five implementing IOs from 1997 to 2020, our analysis suggests that implementation performance is evaluated better where IO country officials have greater field presence. This has implications for debates on multilateral funding, IO bureaucracies, localization, and IO performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Studies Quarterly
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag002
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field Presence and the Performance of Environmental Projects: Evidence from the Global Environment Facility

Bernhard Reinsberg, Giuseppe Zaccaria
International Studies Quarterly
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Field Presence and the Performance of Environmental Projects: Evidence from the Global Environment Facility

Bernhard Reinsberg, Giuseppe Zaccaria
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scant attention has been paid to how field presence shapes the implementation of environment-earmarked projects by international organizations (IOs), such as those funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). GEF funding is based on a process whereby implementing IOs and recipient partners co-design projects based on GEF criteria. Once approved by GEF, projects are implemented with no direct GEF involvement, but are later evaluated by a dedicated GEF unit. We assume that IO country officials are key players in project implementation processes, and we expect that their field presence shapes implementation performance. Drawing on data from approximately 1,000 GEF projects delivered by five implementing IOs from 1997 to 2020, our analysis suggests that implementation performance is evaluated better where IO country officials have greater field presence. This has implications for debates on multilateral funding, IO bureaucracies, localization, and IO performance.

International Studies QuarterlyVol. 70(1)
University of Glasgow (GB)
UK Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.