Mapping the moral domain in a modern town hall: Moral foundations’ effects on collective action conditioned by ideology and issue

We examine a year of political debate in a modern town hall to understand the following: when does moral talk turn to talk about action? For which ideological groupings do specific moral foundations matter and in the context of which issues? We analysed 210,170 tweets about the Australian television programme Q&A – a panel show with synchronous live and online audiences. We examined the topics, prevalence of different moralities and how these moralities explain talk of collective action for different ideological groups. Across all issues and ideological groups, talk of action was most often associated with talk of authority but ideological differences between left- and right-leaning participants emerged. Among left-leaning people, action was motivated by a range of moral foundations, but among right-leaning people action was primarily motivated by authority. Our findings map the ideological diversity found within modern town halls and confirm the critical role of these settings in contemporary socio-political life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251413686
Primary Topic
Social Representations and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the moral domain in a modern town hall: Moral foundations’ effects on collective action conditioned by ideology and issue

Christina Stothard, E. G. Haines, David Kernot, Emma F. Thomas et al.
New Media & Society
Social Representations and Identity
article

Mapping the moral domain in a modern town hall: Moral foundations’ effects on collective action conditioned by ideology and issue

Christina Stothard, E. G. Haines, David Kernot, Emma F. Thomas, Rohit Ram, Marian-Andrei Rizoiu, Morgana Lizzio-Wilson, Irene Caminschi
article en

Abstract

We examine a year of political debate in a modern town hall to understand the following: when does moral talk turn to talk about action? For which ideological groupings do specific moral foundations matter and in the context of which issues? We analysed 210,170 tweets about the Australian television programme Q&A – a panel show with synchronous live and online audiences. We examined the topics, prevalence of different moralities and how these moralities explain talk of collective action for different ideological groups. Across all issues and ideological groups, talk of action was most often associated with talk of authority but ideological differences between left- and right-leaning participants emerged. Among left-leaning people, action was motivated by a range of moral foundations, but among right-leaning people action was primarily motivated by authority. Our findings map the ideological diversity found within modern town halls and confirm the critical role of these settings in contemporary socio-political life.

New Media & Society
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Defence Science and Technology Group (AU), Flinders University (AU), University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Social Representations and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.