Social contingency in embodied neural networks relies on co-constructed dynamical mechanisms

What are the mechanisms that enable organisms to detect and respond to the actions of others? Social contingency, or the degree to which one's actions reliably elicit timely and relevant responses from another, underlies adaptive behaviour and social interaction across species. In order to investigate general principles underlying this phenomenon, we trained and analysed populations of embodied recurrent neural networks engaged in the perceptual crossing task, a minimal social interaction experiment in humans. Through extensive robustness and performance testing, we isolated a subset of 111 circuits. Analysis revealed several shared principles among the robust subset. First, despite uniform performance, we found four distinct behavioural strategies that agents would switch to depending on state history and the strategy of their partner. Next, we found that social contingency does not depend on a single feature of feedback but rather on a scaled relationship between feedback parameters. Finally, using dynamical systems analysis, we identified a shared mechanism for social contingency across all successful circuits. Specifically, it was necessary for the nervous system to couple a contingency cue, a specific temporal pattern in the sensor's activation that distinguishes social from non-social interactions, with a method of conditional stability, a way of structuring the nervous system such that interactions are stable only if the appropriate temporal cue is present. This article is part of the theme issue 'Mechanisms of learning from social interaction'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2025.0098
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social contingency in embodied neural networks relies on co-constructed dynamical mechanisms

Randall D. Beer, Ann‐Sophie Barwich, Gabriel J. Severino, Sasha L. Winkler
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Social contingency in embodied neural networks relies on co-constructed dynamical mechanisms

Randall D. Beer, Ann‐Sophie Barwich, Gabriel J. Severino, Sasha L. Winkler
article en

Abstract

What are the mechanisms that enable organisms to detect and respond to the actions of others? Social contingency, or the degree to which one's actions reliably elicit timely and relevant responses from another, underlies adaptive behaviour and social interaction across species. In order to investigate general principles underlying this phenomenon, we trained and analysed populations of embodied recurrent neural networks engaged in the perceptual crossing task, a minimal social interaction experiment in humans. Through extensive robustness and performance testing, we isolated a subset of 111 circuits. Analysis revealed several shared principles among the robust subset. First, despite uniform performance, we found four distinct behavioural strategies that agents would switch to depending on state history and the strategy of their partner. Next, we found that social contingency does not depend on a single feature of feedback but rather on a scaled relationship between feedback parameters. Finally, using dynamical systems analysis, we identified a shared mechanism for social contingency across all successful circuits. Specifically, it was necessary for the nervous system to couple a contingency cue, a specific temporal pattern in the sensor's activation that distinguishes social from non-social interactions, with a method of conditional stability, a way of structuring the nervous system such that interactions are stable only if the appropriate temporal cue is present. This article is part of the theme issue 'Mechanisms of learning from social interaction'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 381(1943)
Duke University (US), Harvard University Press (US), Duke Energy (United States) (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.