Organic Versus Conventional Fruit Production: Assessing Heavy Metals, Essential Elements, and Key Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Profiles for Nutritional Security

This research was conducted to compare the nutritional characteristics of fruits produced in organic and conventional systems. Sampling was performed on 10 types of fruit, including cherries, sour cherries, apples, peaches, pears, apricots, plums, white mulberries, grapes, and figs. Results indicated that the grapes had the highest content of phosphorus (2274 mg kg −1 ), while sour cherries had the highest potassium content (11330 mg kg −1 ). From an antioxidant perspective, ascorbic acid concentration in organic fruits (4.94 mg 100 g −1 FW) was higher than in conventional fruits (4.44 mg 100 g −1 FW). Total phenolic content in sour cherries (55.46 mg 100 g −1 FW) and apples (50.34 mg 100 g −1 FW) was higher in the organic system. Regarding heavy metals (HMs), figs in the organic system had the highest lead concentration (17.53 mg kg −1 DW), and apples in the conventional system had the highest aluminum concentration (70.43 mg kg −1 DW). Based on the presented data, the two top‐performing fruits in terms of optimal composition of essential elements, antioxidants, and lowest contamination with most HMs were sour cherries and figs. However, while figs exhibited high levels of essential elements, their elevated lead content necessitates cautious interpretation regarding their overall safety and nutritional recommendation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nzc2.70045
Primary Topic
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organic Versus Conventional Fruit Production: Assessing Heavy Metals, Essential Elements, and Key Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Profiles for Nutritional Security

Shahram Sedaghathoor, Marziyeh Rabiee, Behzad Kaviani, Alireza Eslami
New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
article

Organic Versus Conventional Fruit Production: Assessing Heavy Metals, Essential Elements, and Key Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Profiles for Nutritional Security

Shahram Sedaghathoor, Marziyeh Rabiee, Behzad Kaviani, Alireza Eslami
article en

Abstract

This research was conducted to compare the nutritional characteristics of fruits produced in organic and conventional systems. Sampling was performed on 10 types of fruit, including cherries, sour cherries, apples, peaches, pears, apricots, plums, white mulberries, grapes, and figs. Results indicated that the grapes had the highest content of phosphorus (2274 mg kg −1 ), while sour cherries had the highest potassium content (11330 mg kg −1 ). From an antioxidant perspective, ascorbic acid concentration in organic fruits (4.94 mg 100 g −1 FW) was higher than in conventional fruits (4.44 mg 100 g −1 FW). Total phenolic content in sour cherries (55.46 mg 100 g −1 FW) and apples (50.34 mg 100 g −1 FW) was higher in the organic system. Regarding heavy metals (HMs), figs in the organic system had the highest lead concentration (17.53 mg kg −1 DW), and apples in the conventional system had the highest aluminum concentration (70.43 mg kg −1 DW). Based on the presented data, the two top‐performing fruits in terms of optimal composition of essential elements, antioxidants, and lowest contamination with most HMs were sour cherries and figs. However, while figs exhibited high levels of essential elements, their elevated lead content necessitates cautious interpretation regarding their overall safety and nutritional recommendation.

New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural ScienceVol. 54(1)
Islamic Azad University Rasht Branch (IR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.