Hyperpolarization, Distrust, and Civil Religions in America Today

The United States is religiously and politically polarized today, and faith in institutions has reached all-time lows. The persistence of these phenomena make it difficult to apply Robert Bellah’s highly normative and transhistorical conception of civil religion (i.e., “BCR”). This article proposes a process-based, value-neutral, temporally limited theory of civil religion. This “ACR 2.0” adopts broader approaches to religion and politics to capture as many potential civil religious beliefs as possible. It limits analysis to the twenty-first century alone, suggesting civil religions exist along two spectra: religio-political ideology (taking account of hyperpolarization) and orientation toward the status quo (accounting for institutional distrust). ACR 2.0 continues to account for pro-status quo civil religions on the right (George W. Bush and Mitt Romney) and left (Barack Obama); it also captures anti-status quo civil religions on the left (environmentalism and Occupy Wall Street) and right (QAnon and Trumpism).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polity
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/739620
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
55.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hyperpolarization, Distrust, and Civil Religions in America Today

Aaron Q. Weinstein
1 citations
Polity
Religion and Society Interactions
55.57
article

Hyperpolarization, Distrust, and Civil Religions in America Today

Aaron Q. Weinstein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The United States is religiously and politically polarized today, and faith in institutions has reached all-time lows. The persistence of these phenomena make it difficult to apply Robert Bellah’s highly normative and transhistorical conception of civil religion (i.e., “BCR”). This article proposes a process-based, value-neutral, temporally limited theory of civil religion. This “ACR 2.0” adopts broader approaches to religion and politics to capture as many potential civil religious beliefs as possible. It limits analysis to the twenty-first century alone, suggesting civil religions exist along two spectra: religio-political ideology (taking account of hyperpolarization) and orientation toward the status quo (accounting for institutional distrust). ACR 2.0 continues to account for pro-status quo civil religions on the right (George W. Bush and Mitt Romney) and left (Barack Obama); it also captures anti-status quo civil religions on the left (environmentalism and Occupy Wall Street) and right (QAnon and Trumpism).

PolityVol. 58(2)
Fairfield University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Religion and Society Interactions
55.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hyperpolarization, Distrust, and Civil Religions in America Today — Aaron Q. Weinstein · Polity (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS