BUSINESS MANAGEMENT IN ALGORITHMIC ENVIRONMENTS: REDEFINING ACCOUNTABILITY, GOVERNANCE, AND PERFORMANCE

Abstract The increasing integration of algorithmic systems into organizational decision-making has fundamentally altered the landscape of business management. In many contemporary organizations, key managerial decisions are no longer made solely by human judgment but are mediated, informed, or partially executed by algorithms. This shift has created algorithmic environments in which traditional management concepts—such as accountability, governance, and performance—are no longer clearly defined. While existing research often approaches algorithms from technological or ethical perspectives, this paper argues that algorithmic environments represent a core business management challenge rather than a purely technical one. Adopting a management-centered perspective, this study examines how algorithmic decision systems reshape managerial roles, responsibilities, and authority. It argues that when decisions are produced through human–algorithm interaction, conventional models of accountability become insufficient, as responsibility is distributed across managers, systems, and organizational structures. Similarly, governance mechanisms designed for human-centered decision-making struggle to provide transparency, oversight, and control in algorithmically mediated contexts. Performance measurement is also destabilized, as traditional output-based metrics fail to capture decision quality, value alignment, and systemic impact in algorithmic organizations. The paper develops a conceptual framework that redefines accountability, governance, and performance for business management in algorithmic environments. Rather than treating algorithms as autonomous decision-makers or neutral tools, the framework positions them as embedded elements of managerial systems that require deliberate design and oversight. The study demonstrates that effective management in algorithmic environments depends on preserving managerial judgment, redesigning governance structures, and aligning performance metrics with organizational value rather than algorithmic efficiency alone. This research contributes to business management scholarship by reframing algorithmic decision-making as a managerial design problem. It provides theoretical insights and practical implications for organizations seeking to integrate algorithms into management systems without eroding responsibility, control, or strategic coherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18501846
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BUSINESS MANAGEMENT IN ALGORITHMIC ENVIRONMENTS: REDEFINING ACCOUNTABILITY, GOVERNANCE, AND PERFORMANCE

Seyfi Demirsoy
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

BUSINESS MANAGEMENT IN ALGORITHMIC ENVIRONMENTS: REDEFINING ACCOUNTABILITY, GOVERNANCE, AND PERFORMANCE

Seyfi Demirsoy
article en

Abstract

Abstract The increasing integration of algorithmic systems into organizational decision-making has fundamentally altered the landscape of business management. In many contemporary organizations, key managerial decisions are no longer made solely by human judgment but are mediated, informed, or partially executed by algorithms. This shift has created algorithmic environments in which traditional management concepts—such as accountability, governance, and performance—are no longer clearly defined. While existing research often approaches algorithms from technological or ethical perspectives, this paper argues that algorithmic environments represent a core business management challenge rather than a purely technical one. Adopting a management-centered perspective, this study examines how algorithmic decision systems reshape managerial roles, responsibilities, and authority. It argues that when decisions are produced through human–algorithm interaction, conventional models of accountability become insufficient, as responsibility is distributed across managers, systems, and organizational structures. Similarly, governance mechanisms designed for human-centered decision-making struggle to provide transparency, oversight, and control in algorithmically mediated contexts. Performance measurement is also destabilized, as traditional output-based metrics fail to capture decision quality, value alignment, and systemic impact in algorithmic organizations. The paper develops a conceptual framework that redefines accountability, governance, and performance for business management in algorithmic environments. Rather than treating algorithms as autonomous decision-makers or neutral tools, the framework positions them as embedded elements of managerial systems that require deliberate design and oversight. The study demonstrates that effective management in algorithmic environments depends on preserving managerial judgment, redesigning governance structures, and aligning performance metrics with organizational value rather than algorithmic efficiency alone. This research contributes to business management scholarship by reframing algorithmic decision-making as a managerial design problem. It provides theoretical insights and practical implications for organizations seeking to integrate algorithms into management systems without eroding responsibility, control, or strategic coherence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.