Noise-contrastive estimation of dynamic mixture distributions

Maximum likelihood estimation of unnormalized distributions is notoriously challenging, given the intractability of the normalizing constant. We propose an unconditional and a conditional version of the noise-contrastive estimation method, based on two different noise distributions. Our analysis suggests that the two methods are approximately equivalent in terms of statistical efficiency. Compared to maximum likelihood, the noise-contrastive-based estimates have a slightly smaller RMSE for larger sample sizes, especially for the tail distribution parameters. On the other hand, their computing times are about one order of magnitude shorter than maximum likelihood. Finally, in an empirical application to operational risk measurement data, the noise-contrastive-based parameters and risk measures estimates are more precise than the corresponding maximum likelihood-based quantities

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2026.02.004
Primary Topic
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Noise-contrastive estimation of dynamic mixture distributions

Flavio Santi, Marco Bee
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
article

Noise-contrastive estimation of dynamic mixture distributions

Flavio Santi, Marco Bee
article en

Abstract

Maximum likelihood estimation of unnormalized distributions is notoriously challenging, given the intractability of the normalizing constant. We propose an unconditional and a conditional version of the noise-contrastive estimation method, based on two different noise distributions. Our analysis suggests that the two methods are approximately equivalent in terms of statistical efficiency. Compared to maximum likelihood, the noise-contrastive-based estimates have a slightly smaller RMSE for larger sample sizes, especially for the tail distribution parameters. On the other hand, their computing times are about one order of magnitude shorter than maximum likelihood. Finally, in an empirical application to operational risk measurement data, the noise-contrastive-based parameters and risk measures estimates are more precise than the corresponding maximum likelihood-based quantities

Mathematics and Computers in SimulationVol. 246
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.