Review of Prognostic Significance of Quantitative BPE Measurements

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast magnetic resonance imaging reflects hormonal and vascular activity of fibroglandular tissue and is studied as a prognostic marker for breast cancer. This paper serves as a review that evaluates quantitative methods for BPE measurements for predicting treatment outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: PubMed was searched for papers on evaluating BPE with outcomes to compare, such as pathologic complete response, recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival, from 2015 to 2025. In total, eleven papers using quantitative methods to measure BPE were selected. <b>Results</b>: Quantitative results showed that BPE reduction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and high pre-treatment/baseline BPE are linked to improved treatment response and reduced risk of recurrence. <b>Conclusions</b>: Quantitative assessment methods yield objective and reproducible prognostic information. Incorporating quantitative BPE measurements alongside tumor-focused imaging features may further improve predictive accuracy in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16030495
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of Prognostic Significance of Quantitative BPE Measurements

Takouhie Maldjian, Yihui Zhu, Emily Hunt, Tim Q. Duong et al.
Diagnostics
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Review of Prognostic Significance of Quantitative BPE Measurements

Takouhie Maldjian, Yihui Zhu, Emily Hunt, Tim Q. Duong, Jeremy Weiss
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast magnetic resonance imaging reflects hormonal and vascular activity of fibroglandular tissue and is studied as a prognostic marker for breast cancer. This paper serves as a review that evaluates quantitative methods for BPE measurements for predicting treatment outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: PubMed was searched for papers on evaluating BPE with outcomes to compare, such as pathologic complete response, recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival, from 2015 to 2025. In total, eleven papers using quantitative methods to measure BPE were selected. <b>Results</b>: Quantitative results showed that BPE reduction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and high pre-treatment/baseline BPE are linked to improved treatment response and reduced risk of recurrence. <b>Conclusions</b>: Quantitative assessment methods yield objective and reproducible prognostic information. Incorporating quantitative BPE measurements alongside tumor-focused imaging features may further improve predictive accuracy in clinical settings.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(3)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Review of Prognostic Significance of Quantitative BPE Measurements — Takouhie Maldjian, Yihui Zhu, et al. · Diagnostics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS