Component analysis of a self‐monitoring intervention for increasing task engagement for individuals with developmental disabilities

Self-monitoring (SM) has been used as part of intervention packages to enhance skills such as leisure and vocational engagement for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). However, the effectiveness of SM alone remains unclear. We analyzed components of an SM intervention to increase task engagement for five individuals with IDD. Participants were first taught to accurately self-monitor their engagement. Sequential analyses evaluated SM alone, SM + differential reinforcement (DR) for accurate SM, SM + DR for accurate SM and task engagement, and DR for task engagement. SM alone was ineffective. Combining SM with DR for accurate SM improved accuracy of SM for all participants but increased task engagement for only two. Combining SM with DR for both accurate SM and task engagement increased engagement for the remaining participants. High levels of task engagement were maintained when reinforcement for engagement was provided without SM. Implications for intervention design are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.70053
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Component analysis of a self‐monitoring intervention for increasing task engagement for individuals with developmental disabilities

Eileen M. Roscoe, Erin Leif, Lauren Rae, Sam Sheets
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Component analysis of a self‐monitoring intervention for increasing task engagement for individuals with developmental disabilities

Eileen M. Roscoe, Erin Leif, Lauren Rae, Sam Sheets
article en

Abstract

Self-monitoring (SM) has been used as part of intervention packages to enhance skills such as leisure and vocational engagement for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). However, the effectiveness of SM alone remains unclear. We analyzed components of an SM intervention to increase task engagement for five individuals with IDD. Participants were first taught to accurately self-monitor their engagement. Sequential analyses evaluated SM alone, SM + differential reinforcement (DR) for accurate SM, SM + DR for accurate SM and task engagement, and DR for task engagement. SM alone was ineffective. Combining SM with DR for accurate SM improved accuracy of SM for all participants but increased task engagement for only two. Combining SM with DR for both accurate SM and task engagement increased engagement for the remaining participants. High levels of task engagement were maintained when reinforcement for engagement was provided without SM. Implications for intervention design are discussed.

Journal of Applied Behavior AnalysisVol. 59(2)
Western New England University (US), New England Center for Children (US), Monash University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Component analysis of a self‐monitoring intervention for increasing task engagement for individuals with developmental disabilities — Eileen M. Roscoe, Erin Leif, et al. · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS