Navigating hybridity through SDG reporting: a case study of a municipally owned enterprise (MOE) in Italy

Purpose This study aims to investigate how Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) reporting is used by a hybrid municipally owned enterprise (MOE) in Italy to balance public and private expectations in complex institutional settings. It analyses the selection, framing and justification of reported SDGs to show how disclosures help manage governance tensions and a dual organisational identity. Rather than assessing performance, this study focuses on how reporting practices are mobilised to construct, communicate and reconcile hybrid priorities. Design/methodology/approach This research adopts a qualitative single case study design, relying on semi-structured interviews with senior managers and document analyses of sustainability reports and financial statements from 2022 to 2023. The company was selected for its voluntary engagement in SDG reporting and exposure to hybrid tensions. Findings Results show that SDG reporting in the company has evolved from symbolic, narrative-driven disclosures to more structured practices that align with strategic planning and resource allocation. Between 2022 and 2023, the number of reported SDGs increased; references to sub-targets became more explicit; and links between reporting, financial decisions and stakeholder expectations were strengthened. Reporting supported internal co-ordination, identity construction and the negotiation of key paradoxes. Examples of such paradoxes included autonomy versus control and public value versus efficiency. Practical implications This study contributes to paradox theory by demonstrating how SDG reporting can serve as a sensemaking and governance tool in hybrid settings. It also extends the literature on public-sector sustainability reporting by showing how global frameworks can be adapted locally to manage complexity. Practically, this study highlights the value of embedding reporting in a company’s strategic and operational processes to reinforce legitimacy and coherence. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first empirical studies on SDG reporting by an Italian MOE. The findings offer novel insights into hybrid accountability and sustainability governance under voluntary disclosure regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-09-2024-0188
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating hybridity through SDG reporting: a case study of a municipally owned enterprise (MOE) in Italy

Marco Giuliani, Larthia Gaspari, Michele Guidi
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Navigating hybridity through SDG reporting: a case study of a municipally owned enterprise (MOE) in Italy

Marco Giuliani, Larthia Gaspari, Michele Guidi
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate how Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) reporting is used by a hybrid municipally owned enterprise (MOE) in Italy to balance public and private expectations in complex institutional settings. It analyses the selection, framing and justification of reported SDGs to show how disclosures help manage governance tensions and a dual organisational identity. Rather than assessing performance, this study focuses on how reporting practices are mobilised to construct, communicate and reconcile hybrid priorities. Design/methodology/approach This research adopts a qualitative single case study design, relying on semi-structured interviews with senior managers and document analyses of sustainability reports and financial statements from 2022 to 2023. The company was selected for its voluntary engagement in SDG reporting and exposure to hybrid tensions. Findings Results show that SDG reporting in the company has evolved from symbolic, narrative-driven disclosures to more structured practices that align with strategic planning and resource allocation. Between 2022 and 2023, the number of reported SDGs increased; references to sub-targets became more explicit; and links between reporting, financial decisions and stakeholder expectations were strengthened. Reporting supported internal co-ordination, identity construction and the negotiation of key paradoxes. Examples of such paradoxes included autonomy versus control and public value versus efficiency. Practical implications This study contributes to paradox theory by demonstrating how SDG reporting can serve as a sensemaking and governance tool in hybrid settings. It also extends the literature on public-sector sustainability reporting by showing how global frameworks can be adapted locally to manage complexity. Practically, this study highlights the value of embedding reporting in a company’s strategic and operational processes to reinforce legitimacy and coherence. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first empirical studies on SDG reporting by an Italian MOE. The findings offer novel insights into hybrid accountability and sustainability governance under voluntary disclosure regimes.

Qualitative Research in Accounting & ManagementVol. 23(2)
Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.