Prior social feedback creates residual differences in infant attention

For human infants, attention is a crucial skill that both facilitates and constrains learning, with individual differences predicting cognitive development. Traditionally, early attention differences were posited to arise from predetermined non-social mechanisms. However, given human infants' altriciality and extended dependence on carers, persistent attention differences may also be affected by early social feedback. Here, we experimentally tested social influences on early attention by manipulating the form and timing of social interactions, then assessing infant attention in a subsequent behavioural vigilance task. Eighty infants aged 6-7 months interacted with an experimenter who responded to infants' looks and vocalizations using one of four response schedules, varying in contingency (rate of responding to infant behaviour) and joint focus (response congruency with infants' attention). Infants then completed the vigilance task with a new adult. We found that experimenters' prior contingency predicted infants' later attention. When rarely responded to, infants subsequently showed higher vigilance (frequent visual scanning and shorter response latencies) than infants who received high response rates. Furthermore, highly vigilant infants attended more rigidly to highly salient stimuli across task trials. Our findings provide strong experimental evidence that contingent social feedback causally organizes infant attention in later settings, suggesting possible mechanisms for interventions supporting adaptive outcomes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Mechanisms of learning from social interaction'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0364
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
115.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prior social feedback creates residual differences in infant attention

Michael H. Goldstein, Gina Marie Mason
2 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Child and Animal Learning Development
115.92
article

Prior social feedback creates residual differences in infant attention

Michael H. Goldstein, Gina Marie Mason
article en
2 citations

Abstract

For human infants, attention is a crucial skill that both facilitates and constrains learning, with individual differences predicting cognitive development. Traditionally, early attention differences were posited to arise from predetermined non-social mechanisms. However, given human infants' altriciality and extended dependence on carers, persistent attention differences may also be affected by early social feedback. Here, we experimentally tested social influences on early attention by manipulating the form and timing of social interactions, then assessing infant attention in a subsequent behavioural vigilance task. Eighty infants aged 6-7 months interacted with an experimenter who responded to infants' looks and vocalizations using one of four response schedules, varying in contingency (rate of responding to infant behaviour) and joint focus (response congruency with infants' attention). Infants then completed the vigilance task with a new adult. We found that experimenters' prior contingency predicted infants' later attention. When rarely responded to, infants subsequently showed higher vigilance (frequent visual scanning and shorter response latencies) than infants who received high response rates. Furthermore, highly vigilant infants attended more rigidly to highly salient stimuli across task trials. Our findings provide strong experimental evidence that contingent social feedback causally organizes infant attention in later settings, suggesting possible mechanisms for interventions supporting adaptive outcomes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Mechanisms of learning from social interaction'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 381(1943)
Cornell University (US), Brown University (US), Bradley Hospital (US), Warren Alpert Foundation (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Child and Animal Learning Development
115.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.