The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Differentiated Green Innovation in Firms: The Moderating Role of Top Management's Green Attention

ABSTRACT As environmental regulations intensify and the demand for green transformation grows urgent, firms face critical choices in adopting innovation strategies to address institutional pressures and achieve sustainable development. This study investigates how command‐based and market‐based environmental regulations differentially affect symbolic and substantive green innovation, whereas exploring the moderating roles of top management's focused and divided green attention configurations. Drawing on institutional theory and the attention‐based view, we propose that command‐based regulation more strongly promotes symbolic green innovation, whereas market‐based regulation more effectively drives substantive green innovation, and that the two regulation types exert synergistic effects on both innovation dimensions. Data were collected from 352 Chinese firms through a time‐lagged survey design. The results show that command‐based regulation has a stronger positive effect on symbolic green innovation, whereas market‐based regulation more strongly boosts substantive green innovation. The two regulation types also display complementary synergistic effects in fostering both forms of green innovation. Furthermore, focused green attention strengthens the link between command‐based regulation and symbolic innovation but weakens its link to substantive innovation. In contrast, divided green attention enhances the effect of market‐based regulation on substantive innovation while reducing its impact on symbolic innovation. These findings enrich institutional theory and the attention‐based view by revealing heterogeneous regulatory mechanisms and the critical cognitive boundary conditions in the regulation‐innovation process. The study offers practical guidance for managers to align innovation strategies and attention allocation with regulatory contexts and for policymakers to design effective regulation mixes that promote genuine green transformation in firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70451
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Differentiated Green Innovation in Firms: The Moderating Role of Top Management's Green Attention

Zhenzhen Liao, Hao Dong, Liting Wang, Ke Hou et al.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Differentiated Green Innovation in Firms: The Moderating Role of Top Management's Green Attention

Zhenzhen Liao, Hao Dong, Liting Wang, Ke Hou, Xun Wu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As environmental regulations intensify and the demand for green transformation grows urgent, firms face critical choices in adopting innovation strategies to address institutional pressures and achieve sustainable development. This study investigates how command‐based and market‐based environmental regulations differentially affect symbolic and substantive green innovation, whereas exploring the moderating roles of top management's focused and divided green attention configurations. Drawing on institutional theory and the attention‐based view, we propose that command‐based regulation more strongly promotes symbolic green innovation, whereas market‐based regulation more effectively drives substantive green innovation, and that the two regulation types exert synergistic effects on both innovation dimensions. Data were collected from 352 Chinese firms through a time‐lagged survey design. The results show that command‐based regulation has a stronger positive effect on symbolic green innovation, whereas market‐based regulation more strongly boosts substantive green innovation. The two regulation types also display complementary synergistic effects in fostering both forms of green innovation. Furthermore, focused green attention strengthens the link between command‐based regulation and symbolic innovation but weakens its link to substantive innovation. In contrast, divided green attention enhances the effect of market‐based regulation on substantive innovation while reducing its impact on symbolic innovation. These findings enrich institutional theory and the attention‐based view by revealing heterogeneous regulatory mechanisms and the critical cognitive boundary conditions in the regulation‐innovation process. The study offers practical guidance for managers to align innovation strategies and attention allocation with regulatory contexts and for policymakers to design effective regulation mixes that promote genuine green transformation in firms.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Xi'an Shiyou University (CN), Xi’an University (CN), Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.