Risk Factor Analysis of Single Motorcycle Accidents in Road Traffic

This research examines the risk factors that influence injury severity in individual motorcycle accidents, utilising a dataset of 5253 incidents. Five machine learning algorithms—multinomial logistic regression, classification trees, random forests, XGBoost, and neural networks—were used to classify the results into three groups: Death (13.48%), Injury (80.14%), and No injury (6.38%). In all models, passenger presence was the most important predictor of injury. Motorcycle accidents involving passengers do not always have more serious consequences for several overlapping reasons. On the one hand, a motorcycle with a passenger has a significantly higher mass, which increases the braking distance and kinetic energy at the moment of collision, hindering quick defensive manoeuvres, cornering, and reactions to sudden hazards. Often, the rider also refrains from sudden movements to prevent the passenger from losing their balance. In the case of single-rider motorcycle accidents on roadways, approximately 5% of those involved with a passenger were fatalities, while approximately 48% were uninjured; in the case of those without a passenger, no one was uninjured. It follows from the above that the presence of a passenger increases the rider’s sense of responsibility. Other factors that significantly increased risk were single-lane carriageways, vehicle overturning, contaminated road surfaces, and collisions with complex objects, e.g., like trees. The multinomial logistic regression model had an overall accuracy of 69.2% on the test set. The Recurrent Neural Network achieved the best overall accuracy of 79.56%. Balanced accuracy, as the average between sensitivity and specificity of the RNN model for the “death” class was 68.15%, for the “injury” class—72.6%, and for the “no injury” class—96.61%. The Area Under the ROC Curve of the Recurrent Neural Networks model for “no injury” was 0.97, indicating it was very good at distinguishing between this class and the other classes. Even though it was easy to tell which cases did not involve injuries, it was still hard to tell the difference between fatal and non-fatal injuries in all models. The results support interventions tailored to specific situations, such as improved road lighting and speed control in rural areas, as well as helmet enforcement and safety measures at intersections in cities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031629
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Factor Analysis of Single Motorcycle Accidents in Road Traffic

Radovan Madleňák, Piotr Jaśkowski, Przemysław Skoczyński, Mateusz Traczyński et al.
Applied Sciences
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Risk Factor Analysis of Single Motorcycle Accidents in Road Traffic

Radovan Madleňák, Piotr Jaśkowski, Przemysław Skoczyński, Mateusz Traczyński, Edward Kozłowski
article en

Abstract

This research examines the risk factors that influence injury severity in individual motorcycle accidents, utilising a dataset of 5253 incidents. Five machine learning algorithms—multinomial logistic regression, classification trees, random forests, XGBoost, and neural networks—were used to classify the results into three groups: Death (13.48%), Injury (80.14%), and No injury (6.38%). In all models, passenger presence was the most important predictor of injury. Motorcycle accidents involving passengers do not always have more serious consequences for several overlapping reasons. On the one hand, a motorcycle with a passenger has a significantly higher mass, which increases the braking distance and kinetic energy at the moment of collision, hindering quick defensive manoeuvres, cornering, and reactions to sudden hazards. Often, the rider also refrains from sudden movements to prevent the passenger from losing their balance. In the case of single-rider motorcycle accidents on roadways, approximately 5% of those involved with a passenger were fatalities, while approximately 48% were uninjured; in the case of those without a passenger, no one was uninjured. It follows from the above that the presence of a passenger increases the rider’s sense of responsibility. Other factors that significantly increased risk were single-lane carriageways, vehicle overturning, contaminated road surfaces, and collisions with complex objects, e.g., like trees. The multinomial logistic regression model had an overall accuracy of 69.2% on the test set. The Recurrent Neural Network achieved the best overall accuracy of 79.56%. Balanced accuracy, as the average between sensitivity and specificity of the RNN model for the “death” class was 68.15%, for the “injury” class—72.6%, and for the “no injury” class—96.61%. The Area Under the ROC Curve of the Recurrent Neural Networks model for “no injury” was 0.97, indicating it was very good at distinguishing between this class and the other classes. Even though it was easy to tell which cases did not involve injuries, it was still hard to tell the difference between fatal and non-fatal injuries in all models. The results support interventions tailored to specific situations, such as improved road lighting and speed control in rural areas, as well as helmet enforcement and safety measures at intersections in cities.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(3)
Warsaw University of Technology (PL), University of Žilina (SK), Instytut Transportu Samochodowego (PL), Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.