3551 Rehabilitation after pelvic fragility fracture in older adults: a scoping review

Abstract Introduction To synthesise the evidence available on components of reported rehabilitation interventions following pelvic fragility fracture in older adults and describe outcomes measured. Methods: A scoping review reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Scoping Review extension. A systematic search of Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE and PEDr for studies of rehabilitation among patients 60 years and older with non-pathological pelvic fragility fracture, published up to May 2024. Single case studies were excluded. Screening and study selection were completed in duplicate by four independent reviewers. One reviewer completed extraction with accuracy checked by a second reviewer. A narrative synthesis approach was employed with text and tables. Results 17 studies reporting on rehabilitation after pelvic fragility fracture were identified. For 13 studies, descriptors were limited to mobilisation strategies with 9 citing unrestricted mobilisation as the first prescription. Three studies reporting multicomponent, multidisciplinary (physiotherapy-led), rehabilitation interventions across inpatient and community settings, incorporating exercise, psychological components, and education/advice were identified. 31 outcome domains were identified with key domains including pain, mobility, activities of daily living, quality of life, and mortality. There was an absence of consensus on which patient reported outcome instruments to use to measure relevant domains. Conclusions There is overall limited evidence to guide rehabilitation for older adults following fragility fracture of the pelvis. A standardised approach to rehabilitation should be designed which improves outcomes which matter most to those people affected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf368.121
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3551 Rehabilitation after pelvic fragility fracture in older adults: a scoping review

Sophie Barlow, Rhian Milton-Cole, Carina Carter, Lenise Clothier et al.
Age and Ageing
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

3551 Rehabilitation after pelvic fragility fracture in older adults: a scoping review

Sophie Barlow, Rhian Milton-Cole, Carina Carter, Lenise Clothier, S Guerra, K J Sheehan, R Axenciuc, X L Griffin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction To synthesise the evidence available on components of reported rehabilitation interventions following pelvic fragility fracture in older adults and describe outcomes measured. Methods: A scoping review reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Scoping Review extension. A systematic search of Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE and PEDr for studies of rehabilitation among patients 60 years and older with non-pathological pelvic fragility fracture, published up to May 2024. Single case studies were excluded. Screening and study selection were completed in duplicate by four independent reviewers. One reviewer completed extraction with accuracy checked by a second reviewer. A narrative synthesis approach was employed with text and tables. Results 17 studies reporting on rehabilitation after pelvic fragility fracture were identified. For 13 studies, descriptors were limited to mobilisation strategies with 9 citing unrestricted mobilisation as the first prescription. Three studies reporting multicomponent, multidisciplinary (physiotherapy-led), rehabilitation interventions across inpatient and community settings, incorporating exercise, psychological components, and education/advice were identified. 31 outcome domains were identified with key domains including pain, mobility, activities of daily living, quality of life, and mortality. There was an absence of consensus on which patient reported outcome instruments to use to measure relevant domains. Conclusions There is overall limited evidence to guide rehabilitation for older adults following fragility fracture of the pelvis. A standardised approach to rehabilitation should be designed which improves outcomes which matter most to those people affected.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(Supplement_1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.