Market mechanisms and low-income housing patterns in the context of urban growth: study of developer behaviours in Bandung Metropolitan Area Indonesia

The private sector dominates low-income housing provision in both the Global North and South. Compared to the Global North, formal low-income housing in the Global South typically manifests as low-density urban sprawl. This study investigates how the layered motivations and strategies of developers shape low-income housing development patterns in the Bandung Metropolitan Area, Indonesia. Semi-structured interviews with 21 developers—14 focused on subsidised housing and 7 on market housing with low-income housing experience—reveal a mix of motivations that combine economic pragmatism and socio-political considerations shaped by local embeddedness and institutional settings. Despite lower investment returns, low-income housing is perceived as a viable investment due to strong market demand, government support, and personal values. Developers’ continued preference for building single-family homes represents a rational and pragmatic response to cultural preferences, regulatory conditions, and capital constraints. Amid growing urban land scarcity, developers pursue increasingly distant land parcels and employ relational strategies to sustain this development model. As a result, multifamily housing remains marginalised, while developers’ decisions reinforce the trend toward smaller single-family units built farther from urban centres, exacerbating the spatial mismatch between housing and employment opportunities. This study demonstrates how market mechanisms operating within immature institutional frameworks can intensify spatial inequities rather than advance the social objectives of low-income housing. The research suggests that examining land and housing tenure systems can provide valuable insights into the persistence of low-density sprawl in such housing developments. We also recommend policy makers adopt narratives of higher-density housing to challenge such entrenched practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104565
Primary Topic
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market mechanisms and low-income housing patterns in the context of urban growth: study of developer behaviours in Bandung Metropolitan Area Indonesia

Anita Nur Vitriana, Sarah Mawhorter, Johan Woltjer, Sara Özogul
Geoforum
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
article

Market mechanisms and low-income housing patterns in the context of urban growth: study of developer behaviours in Bandung Metropolitan Area Indonesia

Anita Nur Vitriana, Sarah Mawhorter, Johan Woltjer, Sara Özogul
article en

Abstract

The private sector dominates low-income housing provision in both the Global North and South. Compared to the Global North, formal low-income housing in the Global South typically manifests as low-density urban sprawl. This study investigates how the layered motivations and strategies of developers shape low-income housing development patterns in the Bandung Metropolitan Area, Indonesia. Semi-structured interviews with 21 developers—14 focused on subsidised housing and 7 on market housing with low-income housing experience—reveal a mix of motivations that combine economic pragmatism and socio-political considerations shaped by local embeddedness and institutional settings. Despite lower investment returns, low-income housing is perceived as a viable investment due to strong market demand, government support, and personal values. Developers’ continued preference for building single-family homes represents a rational and pragmatic response to cultural preferences, regulatory conditions, and capital constraints. Amid growing urban land scarcity, developers pursue increasingly distant land parcels and employ relational strategies to sustain this development model. As a result, multifamily housing remains marginalised, while developers’ decisions reinforce the trend toward smaller single-family units built farther from urban centres, exacerbating the spatial mismatch between housing and employment opportunities. This study demonstrates how market mechanisms operating within immature institutional frameworks can intensify spatial inequities rather than advance the social objectives of low-income housing. The research suggests that examining land and housing tenure systems can provide valuable insights into the persistence of low-density sprawl in such housing developments. We also recommend policy makers adopt narratives of higher-density housing to challenge such entrenched practices.

GeoforumVol. 170
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.