Effects of Siltuximab Versus Corticosteroids in Preventing <scp>COVID</scp> −19 Pneumonia Disease Progression: Multicentre, Open‐Label, Randomized Clinical Trial

In 2020, COVID-19 caused a global health crisis, prompting research efforts and accelerating drug development. As part of this response, we conducted a phase 2b, multicentre, open-label, randomized (1:1) clinical trial to compare the effects of siltuximab versus corticosteroids on disease progression in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 pneumonia. Between April 2020 and January 2021, 82 patients were randomized to receive siltuximab and 80 corticosteroids (20 methylprednisolone and 60 dexamethasone). Median (IQR) age was 61 years (50-72). Nineteen patients allocated to siltuximab were admitted to the intensive care unit compared to eight receiving corticosteroids (p = 0.025). Corticosteroid treatment was independently associated with a higher risk of avoiding intensive care unit admission (2.7; 95% CI, 1.11-6.62), lower risk of requiring mechanical ventilation (0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.93) and shorter hospitalization duration (p = 0.008). Mortality was similar between arms (p = 0.675). Twenty-eight patients receiving siltuximab required rescue therapy while only 5 receiving corticosteroids (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients receiving corticosteroids had a 53% lower risk of confirmed bacterial or fungal invasive infections (RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.95; p = 0.0096). Our results show that initial treatment with corticosteroids was more effective than siltuximab in preventing disease progression, reducing intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, with shorter hospital stays, and fewer infection in COVID-19 pneumonia. Despite numerous challenges, these findings provide valuable insights into optimizing therapeutic strategies, supporting corticosteroids as a preferred treatment over siltuximab in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70491
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Siltuximab Versus Corticosteroids in Preventing COVID −19 Pneumonia Disease Progression: Multicentre, Open‐Label, Randomized Clinical Trial

Fernanda Meira, David Dalmau, Clara Moreno Castan, José Luís Bernal Muñoz et al.
Clinical and Translational Science
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Effects of Siltuximab Versus Corticosteroids in Preventing COVID −19 Pneumonia Disease Progression: Multicentre, Open‐Label, Randomized Clinical Trial

Fernanda Meira, David Dalmau, Clara Moreno Castan, José Luís Bernal Muñoz, Alex Agustín Gutiérrez Soriano, Adrià Tomé, Gerard Dueñas, Verónica Rico, Nicole García‐Poutón, Montse Tuset, Sabina Herrera, Alex Almuedo, Judit Pich, Daiana Agüero, Sergio Prieto‐González, Marta Hernández‐Meneses, María del Puerto Bernoy González, SILCOR study group, Pedro Castro, Cristina Carbonell, Maria Angeles Marcos, José Antonio Martínez
article en

Abstract

In 2020, COVID-19 caused a global health crisis, prompting research efforts and accelerating drug development. As part of this response, we conducted a phase 2b, multicentre, open-label, randomized (1:1) clinical trial to compare the effects of siltuximab versus corticosteroids on disease progression in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 pneumonia. Between April 2020 and January 2021, 82 patients were randomized to receive siltuximab and 80 corticosteroids (20 methylprednisolone and 60 dexamethasone). Median (IQR) age was 61 years (50-72). Nineteen patients allocated to siltuximab were admitted to the intensive care unit compared to eight receiving corticosteroids (p = 0.025). Corticosteroid treatment was independently associated with a higher risk of avoiding intensive care unit admission (2.7; 95% CI, 1.11-6.62), lower risk of requiring mechanical ventilation (0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.93) and shorter hospitalization duration (p = 0.008). Mortality was similar between arms (p = 0.675). Twenty-eight patients receiving siltuximab required rescue therapy while only 5 receiving corticosteroids (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients receiving corticosteroids had a 53% lower risk of confirmed bacterial or fungal invasive infections (RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.95; p = 0.0096). Our results show that initial treatment with corticosteroids was more effective than siltuximab in preventing disease progression, reducing intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, with shorter hospital stays, and fewer infection in COVID-19 pneumonia. Despite numerous challenges, these findings provide valuable insights into optimizing therapeutic strategies, supporting corticosteroids as a preferred treatment over siltuximab in this setting.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 19(2)
Universidad de Salamanca (ES), University Hospital Mútua de Terrassa (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.