Validation of a Deep-Learning Coregistration Framework for Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT Using Low-Radiation-Exposure Protocols Across Various Tracers
The advent of long-axial-field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems has significantly improved whole-body imaging by providing higher sensitivity and extended torso coverage. However, PET/CT potential misalignment remains a challenge, potentially introducing artifacts and quantification errors. Moreover, PET protocols with reduced scanning duration and dose, as well as the use of ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT), are increasingly relevant in clinical practice and research. This study aimed to evaluate the robustness and generalizability of a deep-learning coregistration framework for PET/CT alignment using low-dose PET and ULD-CT across various tracers with a LAFOV system. <b>Methods:</b> In total, 63 scans with 4 different tracers (<sup>89</sup>Zr-trastuzumab, <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O, <sup>18</sup>F-MC225, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG) were included to assess PET and CT alignment improvements. Further evaluation was performed by comparing CT scans coregistered to the original PET images (rCT) with those coregistered to low-count (50%, 25%, and 12.5% of original counts) PET images (LC-rCT). Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and average surface distance were used as evaluation metrics. Furthermore, ULD-CT coregistered to PET (rULD-CT) was compared with low-dose CT coregistered to the same PET (rLD-CT) using the same metrics. PET accuracy was evaluated by calculating SUVs. <b>Results:</b> The robustness of the deep-learning coregistration framework was demonstrated in reduced PET counts and ULD-CT scenarios across tracers. All metrics indicated robust performance when comparing LC-rCT with rCT and rULD-CT with rLD-CT. Consistent SUVs across varying PET counts and ULD-CT conditions further validated the quantitative accuracy of the approach. <b>Conclusion:</b> This work highlights that neither the use of low-dose PET protocols nor ULD-CT compromise the performance of this coregistration framework across 4 tracers. For LAFOV PET, these findings support the feasibility of such a framework in imaging protocols with reduced radiation exposure.
Authors
- Joyce van Sluis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1908-4518)
- Z. Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7792-0217)
- Joost F. Somsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0761-9002)
- Giordana Salvi de Souza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2243-3141)
- Charalampos Tsoumpas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4971-2477)
- Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8081-0641)
- Laura Providência (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6693-9251)
- Mostafa Roya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2979-3991)
- Gert Luurtsema (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8599-8129)
- Adriaan A. Lammertsma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-2891)
- Samaneh Mostafapour (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-8270)
- Adrienne H. Brouwers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-1516)
- Goudje L van Leeuwen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-8442)
- Jean-Paul P.M. de Vries
- Riemer H.J.A. Slart
- T. Samara Martinez-Lucio
- Maurizio Conti
- Rudi A.J.O. Dierckx
- Paul Schleyer
- Joshua Schaefferkoetter
- Philipp Mohr
Institutions
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- University of Twente (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2026-02-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.270420
- Primary Topic
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00