3878 Scottish care homes’ research involvement and priorities

Abstract Introduction Care home residents and staff have limited, though increasing, opportunities to participate in research. This project aimed to describe motivating and limiting factors for research participation and priorities in Scottish care homes. Methods In a cross-sectional study, a 21-item questionnaire was distributed to Scottish care homes for older people by ENRICH (Enabling Research in Care Homes) Scotland. It included questions on demographics and previous research involvement, with multiple choice and free-text response options. Mixed methods analysis was used including non-parametric descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Ethical approval from University of Edinburgh SREG (ref: 2425 SREG 008). Results There were responses from 121 care homes, (28% ‘small’ <30 beds, 42.9% ‘medium’ 30–60 beds, 28.9% ‘large/very large’ > 60 beds) with ~70% residents with dementia or other neuro-progressive conditions. 40.5% (of 131 responses, multiple responses allowed) had previously been involved in research (19.1% ageing-related, 19.1% dementia-related), 29.8% had chosen not to be involved, 16% reported not being offered opportunities to be involved. Key themes about research participation were that it allows staff/resident perspectives to be heard and can improve care practices. Respondents reported that research participation was decided by family (24.6%), resident (21.9%), manager (20.3%) or others. Important research motivators were altruism: benefits for residents (94 of 631 responses, 14.9%), to help others (13.8%), future generations (12.2%), to find a cure (11.1%) or new treatment (10.1%). Important barriers included workload pressures (82 of 243 responses, 33.7%), time constraints (32.1%), potential for harm (16%) or confidentiality concerns (10.7%). Future research priorities were dementia/neuro-progressive diseases (31 of 124 responses, 25%), staff-related issues (14.5%), activities/quality of life improvements (10.5%), residents’ mental well-being (8.1%) and medications/interventions (6.5%). Conclusion Many care home staff shows that many are keen to be involved in research, but require appropriate support, and the involvement and consideration of multiple stakeholders: staff, researchers, families, residents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf368.150
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3878 Scottish care homes’ research involvement and priorities

Maria Drummond, Rosalie Ashworth, Emma Law, A Hassane et al.
Age and Ageing
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

3878 Scottish care homes’ research involvement and priorities

Maria Drummond, Rosalie Ashworth, Emma Law, A Hassane, S D Shenkin, S Hassane
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Care home residents and staff have limited, though increasing, opportunities to participate in research. This project aimed to describe motivating and limiting factors for research participation and priorities in Scottish care homes. Methods In a cross-sectional study, a 21-item questionnaire was distributed to Scottish care homes for older people by ENRICH (Enabling Research in Care Homes) Scotland. It included questions on demographics and previous research involvement, with multiple choice and free-text response options. Mixed methods analysis was used including non-parametric descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Ethical approval from University of Edinburgh SREG (ref: 2425 SREG 008). Results There were responses from 121 care homes, (28% ‘small’ <30 beds, 42.9% ‘medium’ 30–60 beds, 28.9% ‘large/very large’ > 60 beds) with ~70% residents with dementia or other neuro-progressive conditions. 40.5% (of 131 responses, multiple responses allowed) had previously been involved in research (19.1% ageing-related, 19.1% dementia-related), 29.8% had chosen not to be involved, 16% reported not being offered opportunities to be involved. Key themes about research participation were that it allows staff/resident perspectives to be heard and can improve care practices. Respondents reported that research participation was decided by family (24.6%), resident (21.9%), manager (20.3%) or others. Important research motivators were altruism: benefits for residents (94 of 631 responses, 14.9%), to help others (13.8%), future generations (12.2%), to find a cure (11.1%) or new treatment (10.1%). Important barriers included workload pressures (82 of 243 responses, 33.7%), time constraints (32.1%), potential for harm (16%) or confidentiality concerns (10.7%). Future research priorities were dementia/neuro-progressive diseases (31 of 124 responses, 25%), staff-related issues (14.5%), activities/quality of life improvements (10.5%), residents’ mental well-being (8.1%) and medications/interventions (6.5%). Conclusion Many care home staff shows that many are keen to be involved in research, but require appropriate support, and the involvement and consideration of multiple stakeholders: staff, researchers, families, residents.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(Supplement_1)
NHS Tayside (GB), Department of Health and Aged Care (AU), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.