Impact of Uneven Lighting Environments on Guide Sign Visibility in Interchange Areas of Road Tunnels: A Study of Bright-to-Dark Transitions in Diverging Area

To investigate the impact of “bright to dark” uneven lighting conditions on driver recognition of retroreflective guide signs in the diverging zones of underwater ramp interchanges, this study adjusts the luminance contrast between adjacent lighting segments in a tunnel to explore its effect on the recognition distance of retroreflective guide signs, thereby providing a basis for the rational design of lighting conditions in this area. Based on the driver’s safe recognition process, the minimum sight distance requirements for retroreflective guide signs were first determined under three representative operating speeds. Following the tunnel lighting design principles specified in Chinese standards, eight dark-environment luminance levels and nineteen bright-environment luminance levels were established. A total of 124 non-uniform “bright–dark” lighting combinations were then generated by varying the luminance difference in 1 cd/m2 increments. Subsequently, 24 passenger car drivers were selected to conduct dynamic recognition experiments of guide signs under the “bright–dark” lighting transition conditions in the tunnel ramp diverging zone. Recognition distances were measured using a non-contact speedometer to capture the driver’s distance to the sign. A regression model was developed to quantify the relationship between sign recognition distance, luminance difference, and dark-environment luminance. The model’s accuracy is reflected in the fact that 92.7% of the predicted values had an absolute error of less than 10 m compared to the observed values. The results show that luminance difference has a significant impact on recognition distance, which increases initially and then stabilizes as luminance difference grows. When the dark-environment luminance is below 3.5 cd/m2, the effect of luminance difference on recognition distance is more pronounced than when it exceeds 3.5 cd/m2. Based on these findings, threshold values of bright-environment luminance ensuring safe recognition distances under varying dark-environment luminance conditions are proposed. It is further recommended that, for design speeds of 100 km/h or higher, the dark-environment luminance should not be lower than 2.5 cd/m2 to maintain safe visibility of retroreflective guide signs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031624
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Uneven Lighting Environments on Guide Sign Visibility in Interchange Areas of Road Tunnels: A Study of Bright-to-Dark Transitions in Diverging Area

Ronghua Wang, Zechao Zhang, Yuping Zhang, Shousong Dong et al.
Applied Sciences
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
article

Impact of Uneven Lighting Environments on Guide Sign Visibility in Interchange Areas of Road Tunnels: A Study of Bright-to-Dark Transitions in Diverging Area

Ronghua Wang, Zechao Zhang, Yuping Zhang, Shousong Dong, Jiangbi Hu
article en

Abstract

To investigate the impact of “bright to dark” uneven lighting conditions on driver recognition of retroreflective guide signs in the diverging zones of underwater ramp interchanges, this study adjusts the luminance contrast between adjacent lighting segments in a tunnel to explore its effect on the recognition distance of retroreflective guide signs, thereby providing a basis for the rational design of lighting conditions in this area. Based on the driver’s safe recognition process, the minimum sight distance requirements for retroreflective guide signs were first determined under three representative operating speeds. Following the tunnel lighting design principles specified in Chinese standards, eight dark-environment luminance levels and nineteen bright-environment luminance levels were established. A total of 124 non-uniform “bright–dark” lighting combinations were then generated by varying the luminance difference in 1 cd/m2 increments. Subsequently, 24 passenger car drivers were selected to conduct dynamic recognition experiments of guide signs under the “bright–dark” lighting transition conditions in the tunnel ramp diverging zone. Recognition distances were measured using a non-contact speedometer to capture the driver’s distance to the sign. A regression model was developed to quantify the relationship between sign recognition distance, luminance difference, and dark-environment luminance. The model’s accuracy is reflected in the fact that 92.7% of the predicted values had an absolute error of less than 10 m compared to the observed values. The results show that luminance difference has a significant impact on recognition distance, which increases initially and then stabilizes as luminance difference grows. When the dark-environment luminance is below 3.5 cd/m2, the effect of luminance difference on recognition distance is more pronounced than when it exceeds 3.5 cd/m2. Based on these findings, threshold values of bright-environment luminance ensuring safe recognition distances under varying dark-environment luminance conditions are proposed. It is further recommended that, for design speeds of 100 km/h or higher, the dark-environment luminance should not be lower than 2.5 cd/m2 to maintain safe visibility of retroreflective guide signs.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(3)
Beijing University of Technology (CN), Guangzhou Academy of Special Equipment Inspection and Testing (CN), Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.