Identification and Detection of Specific Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review

This study addresses the enduring controversy surrounding the diagnostic criteria for Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) following the publication of the DSM-5, which is related to their definition. The aim of this study is to review and compare the diagnostic criteria of different classification systems and analyse differences in the identification and evaluation criteria of SLD. To this end, a search of the scientific literature was conducted through ERIC, PsycInfo (Proquest) and Web of Science spanning 2013 to 2024. Fifteen records published in English and focused on school-age children (primary education) were included. The studies address issues in reading, writing and mathematics, using different diagnostic criteria and tools. The findings highlight the need for multidimensional, validated assessments, as well as the importance of early identification to improve access to resources and tackle socio-emotional and motivational factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020249
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification and Detection of Specific Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review

Lidia Infante-Cañete, María-José Robles-Sánchez, Elena Rueda-Flores, Isaías Martín-Ruiz et al.
Education Sciences
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Identification and Detection of Specific Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review

Lidia Infante-Cañete, María-José Robles-Sánchez, Elena Rueda-Flores, Isaías Martín-Ruiz, Elena Alarcón-Orozco
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the enduring controversy surrounding the diagnostic criteria for Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) following the publication of the DSM-5, which is related to their definition. The aim of this study is to review and compare the diagnostic criteria of different classification systems and analyse differences in the identification and evaluation criteria of SLD. To this end, a search of the scientific literature was conducted through ERIC, PsycInfo (Proquest) and Web of Science spanning 2013 to 2024. Fifteen records published in English and focused on school-age children (primary education) were included. The studies address issues in reading, writing and mathematics, using different diagnostic criteria and tools. The findings highlight the need for multidimensional, validated assessments, as well as the importance of early identification to improve access to resources and tackle socio-emotional and motivational factors.

Education SciencesVol. 16(2)
Universidad Internacional De La Rioja (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Universidad de Málaga
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identification and Detection of Specific Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review — Lidia Infante-Cañete, María-José Robles-Sánchez, et al. · Education Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS