Realizing and assessing social successes in invasive species management

Abstract Each year untold numbers of land managers and volunteers work individually and collectively to manage invasive plant, animal, and insect species. Whether such efforts are deemed successful depends on ecological and economic outcomes, with limited consideration of the social processes, costs, and benefits. This article provides a critical reflection of dominant approaches to invasive species management that frequently overlook social processes and outcomes in the setting of program goals and metrics of success. Based on our collective experience researching people's engagement with invasive species and conservation more broadly, we propose that future policy and practice need to incorporate three principles: diversity and social justice, learning from failure, and explicit acknowledgement of social relationships as management enablers. Insights from innovations in invasive species management and other natural resource management fields indicate that such re‐envisioning of invasive species management can produce diverse co‐benefits beyond reducing invasive species impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70229
Primary Topic
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Realizing and assessing social successes in invasive species management

Leonie M. Miller, Nicholas Gill, Thomas Bach, Jennifer Atchison et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
article

Realizing and assessing social successes in invasive species management

Leonie M. Miller, Nicholas Gill, Thomas Bach, Jennifer Atchison, Tanya M. Howard, Sonia Graham, Zhao Ma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Each year untold numbers of land managers and volunteers work individually and collectively to manage invasive plant, animal, and insect species. Whether such efforts are deemed successful depends on ecological and economic outcomes, with limited consideration of the social processes, costs, and benefits. This article provides a critical reflection of dominant approaches to invasive species management that frequently overlook social processes and outcomes in the setting of program goals and metrics of success. Based on our collective experience researching people's engagement with invasive species and conservation more broadly, we propose that future policy and practice need to incorporate three principles: diversity and social justice, learning from failure, and explicit acknowledgement of social relationships as management enablers. Insights from innovations in invasive species management and other natural resource management fields indicate that such re‐envisioning of invasive species management can produce diverse co‐benefits beyond reducing invasive species impacts.

Conservation Science and Practice
University of Wollongong (AU), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Clinical Research Solutions (US), University of New England (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Realizing and assessing social successes in invasive species management — Leonie M. Miller, Nicholas Gill, et al. · Conservation Science and Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS