Experimental investigation on post‐installed anchorages with cast‐in anchor reinforcement under tension loading

Abstract Anchors are used to connect different structural and non‐structural components to reinforced concrete structures. Anchorages when subjected to tension loading might fail in different failure modes, with concrete cone breakout (CCB) being one of the most common. The capacity of an anchorage against CCB can be significantly enhanced by means of anchor reinforcement (also known as supplementary reinforcement in Europe) placed strategically around the anchorage. In case of anchorage with anchor reinforcement, as the crack corresponding to CCB intercepts the anchor reinforcement, it starts to act as a stitching system between the structural body and the breakout body. There are different models available in design codes and literature to calculate the capacity of cast‐in anchorages, like embed plates, with cast‐in anchor reinforcement. Using post‐installed anchors is a popular choice due to their flexibility in terms of design and setting location. However, only overly conservative models are available in standards for post‐installed anchors with anchor reinforcement. This is primarily due to the lack of experimental evidence. Therefore, an experimental investigation was performed in this work using post‐installed anchors with cast‐in anchor reinforcement under tension loading to understand the behavior and verify the performance of post‐installed anchorages when used in conjunction with cast‐in anchor reinforcement. Three types of post‐installed anchors with different load‐transfer mechanisms, namely adhesive anchors, undercut anchors, and torque‐controlled expansion anchors, were tested under concentric tension loading varying the amount and layout of the cast‐in anchor reinforcement. In general, the behavior of post‐installed anchorages with anchor reinforcement was found to be similar to the behavior of cast‐in anchorages with anchor reinforcement. Higher load capacity and larger failure displacement were observed for all three types of anchors when anchor reinforcement was used compared to the reference tests without any anchor reinforcement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70478
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental investigation on post‐installed anchorages with cast‐in anchor reinforcement under tension loading

Boglárka Bokor, Roberto Piccinin, Deepak Suthar, Akanshu Sharma
Structural Concrete
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Experimental investigation on post‐installed anchorages with cast‐in anchor reinforcement under tension loading

Boglárka Bokor, Roberto Piccinin, Deepak Suthar, Akanshu Sharma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Anchors are used to connect different structural and non‐structural components to reinforced concrete structures. Anchorages when subjected to tension loading might fail in different failure modes, with concrete cone breakout (CCB) being one of the most common. The capacity of an anchorage against CCB can be significantly enhanced by means of anchor reinforcement (also known as supplementary reinforcement in Europe) placed strategically around the anchorage. In case of anchorage with anchor reinforcement, as the crack corresponding to CCB intercepts the anchor reinforcement, it starts to act as a stitching system between the structural body and the breakout body. There are different models available in design codes and literature to calculate the capacity of cast‐in anchorages, like embed plates, with cast‐in anchor reinforcement. Using post‐installed anchors is a popular choice due to their flexibility in terms of design and setting location. However, only overly conservative models are available in standards for post‐installed anchors with anchor reinforcement. This is primarily due to the lack of experimental evidence. Therefore, an experimental investigation was performed in this work using post‐installed anchors with cast‐in anchor reinforcement under tension loading to understand the behavior and verify the performance of post‐installed anchorages when used in conjunction with cast‐in anchor reinforcement. Three types of post‐installed anchors with different load‐transfer mechanisms, namely adhesive anchors, undercut anchors, and torque‐controlled expansion anchors, were tested under concentric tension loading varying the amount and layout of the cast‐in anchor reinforcement. In general, the behavior of post‐installed anchorages with anchor reinforcement was found to be similar to the behavior of cast‐in anchorages with anchor reinforcement. Higher load capacity and larger failure displacement were observed for all three types of anchors when anchor reinforcement was used compared to the reference tests without any anchor reinforcement.

Structural Concrete
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Hilti (Liechtenstein) (LI)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.