Geometric Domain Selection in Nanosheet Suspensions: Why Structural Color and X‐Ray Scattering Probe Different Platelet Populations

ABSTRACT Platelet‐based photonic materials derive their optical functionality from nanosheet orientation, yet X‐ray scattering is often assumed to probe the same domain populations that produce structural color. Here we demonstrate that this assumption fails fundamentally in aligned nanosheet suspensions. Using scanning microfocus small‐angle X‐ray scattering (µSAXS) and polarized‐light imaging of confined nematic suspensions of cesium–fluorohectorite double‐bilayer nanosheets, we show that the nanosheets responsible for the uniform blue structural color are not the same nanosheets detected by SAXS. Strong anchoring at the front and back cuvette faces aligns the platelets parallel to those walls, generating a uniform reflection color but orienting their lamellar stacks along the beam direction, which does not meet the x‐ray diffraction conditions. In contrast, µSAXS selectively detects only the edge‐on domains induced by side‐wall anchoring, which rotate the lamellar stacks by ∼90° relative to the face‐anchored population. This geometric selection yields a clear anchoring penetration length of ∼750–1200 µm and reveals uniform d‐spacing within individual interior domains. Our findings establish a general principle for platelet‐based materials: optical and X‐ray measurements interrogate distinct orientation subsets, with direct implications for structural colors, nanoflake coatings, liquid‐crystal nanocomposites, and any system where functionality depends on nanosheet alignment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Optical Materials
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.70966
Primary Topic
Photonic Crystals and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometric Domain Selection in Nanosheet Suspensions: Why Structural Color and X‐Ray Scattering Probe Different Platelet Populations

Jon Otto Fossum, Barbara Pacakova
Advanced Optical Materials
Photonic Crystals and Applications
article

Geometric Domain Selection in Nanosheet Suspensions: Why Structural Color and X‐Ray Scattering Probe Different Platelet Populations

Jon Otto Fossum, Barbara Pacakova
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Platelet‐based photonic materials derive their optical functionality from nanosheet orientation, yet X‐ray scattering is often assumed to probe the same domain populations that produce structural color. Here we demonstrate that this assumption fails fundamentally in aligned nanosheet suspensions. Using scanning microfocus small‐angle X‐ray scattering (µSAXS) and polarized‐light imaging of confined nematic suspensions of cesium–fluorohectorite double‐bilayer nanosheets, we show that the nanosheets responsible for the uniform blue structural color are not the same nanosheets detected by SAXS. Strong anchoring at the front and back cuvette faces aligns the platelets parallel to those walls, generating a uniform reflection color but orienting their lamellar stacks along the beam direction, which does not meet the x‐ray diffraction conditions. In contrast, µSAXS selectively detects only the edge‐on domains induced by side‐wall anchoring, which rotate the lamellar stacks by ∼90° relative to the face‐anchored population. This geometric selection yields a clear anchoring penetration length of ∼750–1200 µm and reveals uniform d‐spacing within individual interior domains. Our findings establish a general principle for platelet‐based materials: optical and X‐ray measurements interrogate distinct orientation subsets, with direct implications for structural colors, nanoflake coatings, liquid‐crystal nanocomposites, and any system where functionality depends on nanosheet alignment.

Advanced Optical MaterialsVol. 14(9)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), SCL International (FR)
Norges Forskningsråd, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Photonic Crystals and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.