Comparison of CT Protocols in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Operational Efficiency

BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults. However, the optimal contrast protocol remains debated, balancing diagnostic accuracy, operational efficiency, and patient safety.ObjectiveTo systematically compare the diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency of different CT contrast protocols-oral, intravenous (IV), combined oral + IV, and non-contrast-in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis.MethodsA comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies compared CT contrast protocols in adults (≥18 years) and reported diagnostic or operational outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value; secondary outcomes included time to CT completion and emergency department (ED) length of stay.ResultsSeventeen studies involving 5033 patients met inclusion criteria. Non-contrast CT demonstrated sensitivity of 82.4-90.5% and specificity of 75-100%. Oral contrast-only protocols showed sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 80%. Combined oral + IV protocols achieved sensitivity of 89.4-100% and specificity of 54.5-98.5%. IV-only protocols provided sensitivity of 77.8-100% and specificity of 87-100%. Across studies, eliminating oral contrast reduced ED length of stay by 29-91 minutes without compromising diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionsIV-only or non-contrast CT protocols offer comparable diagnostic accuracy to oral contrast approaches while significantly improving workflow efficiency. Protocol selection should consider clinical setting and patient factors, reserving oral contrast for select groups such as oncology patients or those with prior abdominal surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261423912
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of CT Protocols in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Operational Efficiency

Fadi Bder, Nir Messer, Rina Neeman, Fahim Kanani et al.
The American Surgeon
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Comparison of CT Protocols in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Operational Efficiency

Fadi Bder, Nir Messer, Rina Neeman, Fahim Kanani, Mohammad Maraqah, Anastasiia Iserlis, Nuha Riyad, N Zoabi, Osama Ewidat
article en

Abstract

BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults. However, the optimal contrast protocol remains debated, balancing diagnostic accuracy, operational efficiency, and patient safety.ObjectiveTo systematically compare the diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency of different CT contrast protocols-oral, intravenous (IV), combined oral + IV, and non-contrast-in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis.MethodsA comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies compared CT contrast protocols in adults (≥18 years) and reported diagnostic or operational outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value; secondary outcomes included time to CT completion and emergency department (ED) length of stay.ResultsSeventeen studies involving 5033 patients met inclusion criteria. Non-contrast CT demonstrated sensitivity of 82.4-90.5% and specificity of 75-100%. Oral contrast-only protocols showed sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 80%. Combined oral + IV protocols achieved sensitivity of 89.4-100% and specificity of 54.5-98.5%. IV-only protocols provided sensitivity of 77.8-100% and specificity of 87-100%. Across studies, eliminating oral contrast reduced ED length of stay by 29-91 minutes without compromising diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionsIV-only or non-contrast CT protocols offer comparable diagnostic accuracy to oral contrast approaches while significantly improving workflow efficiency. Protocol selection should consider clinical setting and patient factors, reserving oral contrast for select groups such as oncology patients or those with prior abdominal surgery.

The American Surgeon
Hebron University (PS), An-Najah National University (PS), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Wolfson Medical Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.