24: Plan E: Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Rescue Strategy for Airway Management: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction: Airway emergencies such as severe tracheal trauma, obstructing airway tumors, and complex anatomical deformities can make intubation or surgical airway difficult, resulting in catastrophic hypoxemia. Conventional difficult-airway algorithms (Plans A–D) may not be feasible in these situations. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) offers a “Plan E” strategy by providing extracorporeal oxygenation independent of airway patency, creating a safe bridge for definitive airway, surgical management or recovery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients supported with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for airway compromise in the Adan Hospital ICU between 2016 and 2025. Data collected included demographics, airway indication, surgical intervention, ECLS modality (VV ECMO or ECCO2R), and in-hospital survival. Institutional ethical approval was obtained. Results: Six patients required ECLS for airway emergencies. Indications were tracheal injury (n = 3), tracheal mass with failed intubation (n = 1), tracheal stenosis (n = 1), and advanced kyphoscoliosis with difficult intubation (n = 1). VV ECMO was used in four patients, and ECCO2R in two. Surgical intervention was performed in four cases. Overall survival was 83 % (5/6). One patient with extensive tracheal injury did not survive. No major ECLS-related complications were observed. Limitations: This single-center, retrospective case series is limited by small sample size, lack of a comparison group, and limited long-term follow-up. Selection bias may affect generalizability. Conclusions: VV ECMO served as a safe and effective “Plan E” rescue option when conventional airway strategies failed. Early multidisciplinary planning and timely initiation were critical for success. Broader adoption of structured “Plan E” protocols and multicenter collaboration are warranted to refine indications and optimize outcomes. Keywords: Airway management; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Veno-venous ECMO; Difficult airway; Tracheal injury; Airway obstruction; Rescue oxygenation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mat.0001180796.01773.e7
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

24: Plan E: Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Rescue Strategy for Airway Management: A Single-Center Experience

Ahmed Hosni, Syed Ali, Eslam Adel Ali, Ahmed El Masry et al.
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

24: Plan E: Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Rescue Strategy for Airway Management: A Single-Center Experience

Ahmed Hosni, Syed Ali, Eslam Adel Ali, Ahmed El Masry, Mervat Abdel Fattah, Ahmed Hani, Muhammad Usman Rafique
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Airway emergencies such as severe tracheal trauma, obstructing airway tumors, and complex anatomical deformities can make intubation or surgical airway difficult, resulting in catastrophic hypoxemia. Conventional difficult-airway algorithms (Plans A–D) may not be feasible in these situations. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) offers a “Plan E” strategy by providing extracorporeal oxygenation independent of airway patency, creating a safe bridge for definitive airway, surgical management or recovery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients supported with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for airway compromise in the Adan Hospital ICU between 2016 and 2025. Data collected included demographics, airway indication, surgical intervention, ECLS modality (VV ECMO or ECCO2R), and in-hospital survival. Institutional ethical approval was obtained. Results: Six patients required ECLS for airway emergencies. Indications were tracheal injury (n = 3), tracheal mass with failed intubation (n = 1), tracheal stenosis (n = 1), and advanced kyphoscoliosis with difficult intubation (n = 1). VV ECMO was used in four patients, and ECCO2R in two. Surgical intervention was performed in four cases. Overall survival was 83 % (5/6). One patient with extensive tracheal injury did not survive. No major ECLS-related complications were observed. Limitations: This single-center, retrospective case series is limited by small sample size, lack of a comparison group, and limited long-term follow-up. Selection bias may affect generalizability. Conclusions: VV ECMO served as a safe and effective “Plan E” rescue option when conventional airway strategies failed. Early multidisciplinary planning and timely initiation were critical for success. Broader adoption of structured “Plan E” protocols and multicenter collaboration are warranted to refine indications and optimize outcomes. Keywords: Airway management; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Veno-venous ECMO; Difficult airway; Tracheal injury; Airway obstruction; Rescue oxygenation.

ASAIO JournalVol. 72(Supplement 1)
Adan Hospital (KW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.