Machine learning for predicting aroma, flavour and preference of foods and beverages: case studies with small and imbalanced datasets

Datasets for training and testing machine learning models to predict intensities of aroma and flavour attributes and preference ratings for foods and beverages from instrumental measurements are often limited in size due to the cost and effort of producing and analysing samples. A consequence can be poor and unreliable predictive performance of models. Case studies using published white wine, citrus peel and yoghurt datasets have been conducted to examine potential solutions. Selecting expressive instrumental measurements that meaningfully reflect sensory attributes or drivers of preference is important for accurate prediction. Using a categorical scale with a limited number of categories for sensory evaluation can help ensure sufficient samples are allocated to each category, improving model generalisability and reducing prediction bias. After data collection, accuracy can be increased by merging categories to blend out a portion of any sensory noise and balance samples more evenly across the remaining categories. The latter can be helpful if techniques such as Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) prove unsatisfactory for addressing prediction bias in models trained on imbalanced datasets. • Machine learning model accuracy and reliability can suffer from small datasets. • Good sample coverage over sensory scale supports model generalisation, lowers bias. • Merging sensory scale categories improves accuracy by blending out sensory noise. • Under and/or oversampling to balance training sets may not improve model accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2026.105877
Primary Topic
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning for predicting aroma, flavour and preference of foods and beverages: case studies with small and imbalanced datasets

Venkata Chelikani, JJ Nijdam, Damir D. Torrico, Lokesh Kumar
Food Quality and Preference
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
article

Machine learning for predicting aroma, flavour and preference of foods and beverages: case studies with small and imbalanced datasets

Venkata Chelikani, JJ Nijdam, Damir D. Torrico, Lokesh Kumar
article en

Abstract

Datasets for training and testing machine learning models to predict intensities of aroma and flavour attributes and preference ratings for foods and beverages from instrumental measurements are often limited in size due to the cost and effort of producing and analysing samples. A consequence can be poor and unreliable predictive performance of models. Case studies using published white wine, citrus peel and yoghurt datasets have been conducted to examine potential solutions. Selecting expressive instrumental measurements that meaningfully reflect sensory attributes or drivers of preference is important for accurate prediction. Using a categorical scale with a limited number of categories for sensory evaluation can help ensure sufficient samples are allocated to each category, improving model generalisability and reducing prediction bias. After data collection, accuracy can be increased by merging categories to blend out a portion of any sensory noise and balance samples more evenly across the remaining categories. The latter can be helpful if techniques such as Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) prove unsatisfactory for addressing prediction bias in models trained on imbalanced datasets. • Machine learning model accuracy and reliability can suffer from small datasets. • Good sample coverage over sensory scale supports model generalisation, lowers bias. • Merging sensory scale categories improves accuracy by blending out sensory noise. • Under and/or oversampling to balance training sets may not improve model accuracy.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 140
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Lincoln University (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.