Frontline state security: rebel movements and cover states in Southern Africa, 1970–1990

Exile is a key dimension of armed groups, which often depend on the safety of third-party countries to establish headquarters, train soldiers, and forge connections with the outside world. A fitting illustration are the Frontline States in Africa, which offered refuge to multiple national liberation movements in the second half the twentieth century. While it is generally acknowledged that exile offers ample opportunities for armed groups to develop their organizations, the ability of host nations to influence the internal politics of exiled armed groups remains understudied. This paper offers a comparative analysis of the interventions of the Frontline States in the mutinies of three African national liberation movements. We argue that intervention in the internal affairs of anticolonial organizations was a double-edged sword: on the one hand, it contributed to the successful conclusion of the struggle for liberation, but on the other hand, it stimulated the development of authoritarian political culture.<br>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Wars and Insurgencies
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2026.2626453
Primary Topic
African studies and sociopolitical issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frontline state security: rebel movements and cover states in Southern Africa, 1970–1990

John Burton Kegel, Tycho van der Hoog
Small Wars and Insurgencies
African studies and sociopolitical issues
article

Frontline state security: rebel movements and cover states in Southern Africa, 1970–1990

John Burton Kegel, Tycho van der Hoog
article en

Abstract

Exile is a key dimension of armed groups, which often depend on the safety of third-party countries to establish headquarters, train soldiers, and forge connections with the outside world. A fitting illustration are the Frontline States in Africa, which offered refuge to multiple national liberation movements in the second half the twentieth century. While it is generally acknowledged that exile offers ample opportunities for armed groups to develop their organizations, the ability of host nations to influence the internal politics of exiled armed groups remains understudied. This paper offers a comparative analysis of the interventions of the Frontline States in the mutinies of three African national liberation movements. We argue that intervention in the internal affairs of anticolonial organizations was a double-edged sword: on the one hand, it contributed to the successful conclusion of the struggle for liberation, but on the other hand, it stimulated the development of authoritarian political culture.<br>

Small Wars and InsurgenciesVol. 37(3)
Netherlands Defence Academy (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
African studies and sociopolitical issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Frontline state security: rebel movements and cover states in Southern Africa, 1970–1990 — John Burton Kegel, Tycho van der Hoog · Small Wars and Insurgencies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS