Knowledge, attitudes, and skills towards evidence-based medicine among Palestinian undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been increasingly emphasized within undergraduate medical education; however, its implementation remains inconsistent across many low- and middle-income countries. In Palestine, restricted access to scientific resources, inconsistent mentorship, and limited institutional funding and support may have affected students’ competencies in EBM. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, skills, and information-seeking behaviours related to EBM among undergraduate medical students in the West Bank. A cross-sectional study was conducted between 14 September 2025 and 1 November 2025, among second to sixth-year medical undergraduates at five Palestinian universities. The questionnaire was distributed through convenience sampling and included five sections: demographics, information-seeking behaviours, EBM knowledge, skills, and students’ attitudes towards it. Analyses were performed using Jamovi 2.6.44 statistical package. A total of 709 students participated, with a mean age of 21.3 years, of whom 37% had trained in EBM. Practical workshops were the most preferred learning modality (31%), while medical books were the most frequently used source of information (83.6%). Regarding search engines, PubMed, Google and Google scholar were the most accessed. Attendance at biostatistics or research methodology courses was significantly associated with prior EBM training. Overall, students showed positive attitudes towards EBM, and average self-rated skills. However mean score for each skill was significantly higher in EBM-trained undergraduates compared to non-trained peers (p value < 0.001). Understanding of EBM-related terms varied, with participants being more familiar with basic terms than advanced terms, such as heterogeneity, and number needed to treat (NNT), and prior EBM training was consistently associated with higher knowledge scores for key terms. As for research barriers, the majority reported limited access to paid databases, limited funding, and inconsistent mentorship. Palestinian medical students held positive stance towards evidence-based medicine, recognizing its clinical value. However, their skills and terminology knowledge were still somehow limited. Integrating EBM training into curriculum, enhancing faculty support, and expanding access to resources can strengthen students’ competency and prepare them for evidence-based clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08750-6
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, attitudes, and skills towards evidence-based medicine among Palestinian undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study

Hebatallah Qawasmeh, Suhaib Sultan Alkhateeb, Azzam Zrineh, Bashar Douden et al.
BMC Medical Education
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Knowledge, attitudes, and skills towards evidence-based medicine among Palestinian undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study

Hebatallah Qawasmeh, Suhaib Sultan Alkhateeb, Azzam Zrineh, Bashar Douden, Rasha K. Ahmad, Hamza Karmi, Rami Akwan, Firas Awawdeh
article en

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been increasingly emphasized within undergraduate medical education; however, its implementation remains inconsistent across many low- and middle-income countries. In Palestine, restricted access to scientific resources, inconsistent mentorship, and limited institutional funding and support may have affected students’ competencies in EBM. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, skills, and information-seeking behaviours related to EBM among undergraduate medical students in the West Bank. A cross-sectional study was conducted between 14 September 2025 and 1 November 2025, among second to sixth-year medical undergraduates at five Palestinian universities. The questionnaire was distributed through convenience sampling and included five sections: demographics, information-seeking behaviours, EBM knowledge, skills, and students’ attitudes towards it. Analyses were performed using Jamovi 2.6.44 statistical package. A total of 709 students participated, with a mean age of 21.3 years, of whom 37% had trained in EBM. Practical workshops were the most preferred learning modality (31%), while medical books were the most frequently used source of information (83.6%). Regarding search engines, PubMed, Google and Google scholar were the most accessed. Attendance at biostatistics or research methodology courses was significantly associated with prior EBM training. Overall, students showed positive attitudes towards EBM, and average self-rated skills. However mean score for each skill was significantly higher in EBM-trained undergraduates compared to non-trained peers (p value < 0.001). Understanding of EBM-related terms varied, with participants being more familiar with basic terms than advanced terms, such as heterogeneity, and number needed to treat (NNT), and prior EBM training was consistently associated with higher knowledge scores for key terms. As for research barriers, the majority reported limited access to paid databases, limited funding, and inconsistent mentorship. Palestinian medical students held positive stance towards evidence-based medicine, recognizing its clinical value. However, their skills and terminology knowledge were still somehow limited. Integrating EBM training into curriculum, enhancing faculty support, and expanding access to resources can strengthen students’ competency and prepare them for evidence-based clinical practice.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
An-Najah National University (PS), Al-Quds University (PS), Palestine Polytechnic University (PS), Syrian Private University (SY), Arab American University (PS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.