The impact of symptom severity and interpersonal problems in psychotherapy for depression with or without comorbid personality disorders: a sub-analysis of a randomised clinical trial

Short-term psychotherapies are effective for depression, but remission rates remain modest. Given the frequent co-occurrence of depression, personality disorders, and interpersonal problems, this study examined the association of comorbid personality disorders (PD) on depression outcome while accounting for baseline symptom severity and interpersonal problems. Data were derived from a randomized clinical trial comparing two 16-session psychotherapies for depression. Multilevel regression analyses tested whether baseline symptom severity (composite index of standardized scores of symptom measures), interpersonal problems (Outcome Questionnaire interpersonal relations scale), comorbid personality disorders (International Personality Disorder Examination – Self Report), predicted outcome (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale). Depressed patients with comorbid PD had higher baseline symptom severity and interpersonal problems. They showed a trend toward one-year follow-up ( EMMs = 13.44 vs. 10.44, t = -1.84, P = .07). However, after controlling for baseline symptom severity, neither comorbid PD nor interpersonal problems predicted depression outcome, whereas baseline symptom severity remained a robust predictor of follow-up depression ( B = 3.17, SE = 0.44, P < .01). The negative association of comorbid PD on depression outcome is explained by baseline symptom severity. Baseline severity, rather than PD or interpersonal problems, is the most robust predictor of treatment response. • Depressed patients with and without comorbid PD improved over one year, but patients with comorbid PD consistently reporting higher symptom levels. • Comorbid PD was not associated with differential depressed symptom change over time, but showed a trend before adjustment of baseline severity index and interpersonal problems. • Higher follow-up depression in patients with comorbid PD was explained by baseline severity index and interpersonal problems. After additional adjustment, baseline symptom severity remained the primary predictor of outcome

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry Research Communications
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psycom.2026.100247
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of symptom severity and interpersonal problems in psychotherapy for depression with or without comorbid personality disorders: a sub-analysis of a randomised clinical trial

David Koppers, Jaap Peen, Jack Dekker, Henricus Van
Psychiatry Research Communications
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

The impact of symptom severity and interpersonal problems in psychotherapy for depression with or without comorbid personality disorders: a sub-analysis of a randomised clinical trial

David Koppers, Jaap Peen, Jack Dekker, Henricus Van
article en

Abstract

Short-term psychotherapies are effective for depression, but remission rates remain modest. Given the frequent co-occurrence of depression, personality disorders, and interpersonal problems, this study examined the association of comorbid personality disorders (PD) on depression outcome while accounting for baseline symptom severity and interpersonal problems. Data were derived from a randomized clinical trial comparing two 16-session psychotherapies for depression. Multilevel regression analyses tested whether baseline symptom severity (composite index of standardized scores of symptom measures), interpersonal problems (Outcome Questionnaire interpersonal relations scale), comorbid personality disorders (International Personality Disorder Examination – Self Report), predicted outcome (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale). Depressed patients with comorbid PD had higher baseline symptom severity and interpersonal problems. They showed a trend toward one-year follow-up ( EMMs = 13.44 vs. 10.44, t = -1.84, P = .07). However, after controlling for baseline symptom severity, neither comorbid PD nor interpersonal problems predicted depression outcome, whereas baseline symptom severity remained a robust predictor of follow-up depression ( B = 3.17, SE = 0.44, P < .01). The negative association of comorbid PD on depression outcome is explained by baseline symptom severity. Baseline severity, rather than PD or interpersonal problems, is the most robust predictor of treatment response. • Depressed patients with and without comorbid PD improved over one year, but patients with comorbid PD consistently reporting higher symptom levels. • Comorbid PD was not associated with differential depressed symptom change over time, but showed a trend before adjustment of baseline severity index and interpersonal problems. • Higher follow-up depression in patients with comorbid PD was explained by baseline severity index and interpersonal problems. After additional adjustment, baseline symptom severity remained the primary predictor of outcome

Psychiatry Research CommunicationsVol. 6(1)
Reinier van Arkel (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.