Sociolinguistic Characteristics of Artificial Intelligence

The paper discusses sociolinguistic characteristics of artificial intelligence, a man-made programmable machine intellect designed to perform actions traditionally considered intellectual. The article clarifies the attributes of intelligence in everyday and academic thinking: common everyday situations require prudence and resourcefulness; in psychological terms, learning ability and problem-solving ability are emphasized; in philosophical understanding, the levels of intelligence – from the ability to think abstractly to the ability to operate with high-order ideas – turn to be important. The material used is data obtained from question-and-answer dialogues with online artificial intelligence. Intentional functions of communication with artificial intelligence for humans consist primarily in searching and clarifying various information; AI programmed responses are reduced to reporting the necessary information, while the robot avoids conflicts when responding to provocative statements. The following behavioral norms can be traced in the reactions of the voice assistant Alissa to different types of initiative statements: demonstration of polite and kind attitude to the communication partner, observance of etiquette behavior models, reaction in the question form in case of insufficient information, and imitation of natural emotional reactions. In detailed answers to questions that elicit emotional reactions to certain stimuli, artificial intelligence expresses the opinions of those who designed it. Communication with a robot should be built on the recognition of the machine as a useful tool, but not as a human being. While verbal responses from artificial intelligence are quite in line with the standards of institutional communication, whenever a situation allows for ambiguity of interpretation in the context of artistic perception of reality, such responses cannot yet be deemed satisfactory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331625602117
Primary Topic
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociolinguistic Characteristics of Artificial Intelligence

V. I. Karasik
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
article

Sociolinguistic Characteristics of Artificial Intelligence

V. I. Karasik
article en

Abstract

The paper discusses sociolinguistic characteristics of artificial intelligence, a man-made programmable machine intellect designed to perform actions traditionally considered intellectual. The article clarifies the attributes of intelligence in everyday and academic thinking: common everyday situations require prudence and resourcefulness; in psychological terms, learning ability and problem-solving ability are emphasized; in philosophical understanding, the levels of intelligence – from the ability to think abstractly to the ability to operate with high-order ideas – turn to be important. The material used is data obtained from question-and-answer dialogues with online artificial intelligence. Intentional functions of communication with artificial intelligence for humans consist primarily in searching and clarifying various information; AI programmed responses are reduced to reporting the necessary information, while the robot avoids conflicts when responding to provocative statements. The following behavioral norms can be traced in the reactions of the voice assistant Alissa to different types of initiative statements: demonstration of polite and kind attitude to the communication partner, observance of etiquette behavior models, reaction in the question form in case of insufficient information, and imitation of natural emotional reactions. In detailed answers to questions that elicit emotional reactions to certain stimuli, artificial intelligence expresses the opinions of those who designed it. Communication with a robot should be built on the recognition of the machine as a useful tool, but not as a human being. While verbal responses from artificial intelligence are quite in line with the standards of institutional communication, whenever a situation allows for ambiguity of interpretation in the context of artistic perception of reality, such responses cannot yet be deemed satisfactory.

Herald of the Russian Academy of SciencesVol. 95(3)
Pushkin State Russian language Institute (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.