Evaluation of a perforator flap-based microsurgical training course: a cross-sectional study

Our institution has conducted an annual perforator flap-based microsurgical training course for clinicians from different institutions. This study aims to characterize the post-training practice patterns and outcomes of the course. From 2016 to 2022, a two-week course was conducted annually, including three modules: theoretical lectures, cadaver-based surgical simulation, and live surgical demonstrations. A cross-sectional study was carried out among course participants in November 2024. Participant demographics, training backgrounds, course evaluations, and their clinical practice over the two years following the training were collected and analysed. A total of 279 two-year follow-up questionnaires were distributed, with a 74.6% response rate, yielding 208 completed questionnaires. On the basis of microsurgical experience, the trainees were divided into three groups: the inexperienced group (n = 34), intermediate group (n = 139), and experienced group (n = 35). The participants highly rated the course, with an overall score of 4.92 out of 5. Surgical simulation emerged as the most beneficial module. After training, 191 trainees (91.8%) performed perforator flap surgeries, with an average of 54 surgeries performed over 2 years and a success rate of 95.5%. The participation rate was 100% in the experienced group and 94.2% in the intermediate group, which was significantly higher than the 73.5% in the inexperienced group (p < 0.05). The mean procedure volume was significantly higher in both the experienced (56 cases) and intermediate (57 cases) groups than in the inexperienced group (37 cases) (p < 0.05). The perforator flap-based microsurgical training course provides systematic training, covering theoretical lectures, cadaver-based surgical simulation, and live case surgical demonstrations. Participation in this course was associated with the successful clinical application of perforator flap techniques across all experience levels. The curriculum equipped surgeons with a structured foundation, enabling them to implement these procedures with a high degree of proficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08708-8
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a perforator flap-based microsurgical training course: a cross-sectional study

Juyu Tang, Fang Yu, Liming Qing, Panfeng Wu et al.
BMC Medical Education
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Evaluation of a perforator flap-based microsurgical training course: a cross-sectional study

Juyu Tang, Fang Yu, Liming Qing, Panfeng Wu, Xinlei Sui
article en

Abstract

Our institution has conducted an annual perforator flap-based microsurgical training course for clinicians from different institutions. This study aims to characterize the post-training practice patterns and outcomes of the course. From 2016 to 2022, a two-week course was conducted annually, including three modules: theoretical lectures, cadaver-based surgical simulation, and live surgical demonstrations. A cross-sectional study was carried out among course participants in November 2024. Participant demographics, training backgrounds, course evaluations, and their clinical practice over the two years following the training were collected and analysed. A total of 279 two-year follow-up questionnaires were distributed, with a 74.6% response rate, yielding 208 completed questionnaires. On the basis of microsurgical experience, the trainees were divided into three groups: the inexperienced group (n = 34), intermediate group (n = 139), and experienced group (n = 35). The participants highly rated the course, with an overall score of 4.92 out of 5. Surgical simulation emerged as the most beneficial module. After training, 191 trainees (91.8%) performed perforator flap surgeries, with an average of 54 surgeries performed over 2 years and a success rate of 95.5%. The participation rate was 100% in the experienced group and 94.2% in the intermediate group, which was significantly higher than the 73.5% in the inexperienced group (p < 0.05). The mean procedure volume was significantly higher in both the experienced (56 cases) and intermediate (57 cases) groups than in the inexperienced group (37 cases) (p < 0.05). The perforator flap-based microsurgical training course provides systematic training, covering theoretical lectures, cadaver-based surgical simulation, and live case surgical demonstrations. Participation in this course was associated with the successful clinical application of perforator flap techniques across all experience levels. The curriculum equipped surgeons with a structured foundation, enabling them to implement these procedures with a high degree of proficiency.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Central South University (CN), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.