In vitro activity of recently introduced Gram-positive-specific antimicrobial agents against Australian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Existing therapeutic options are limited for severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Newer antimicrobials with anti-MRSA activity have been introduced, but evaluation of pre-existing resistance in the Australian setting is limited. Our objectives are to characterise the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the common MRSA sequence types (STs) in Australia relating to newer antimicrobial agents to determine the association between non-susceptibility and ST, trends in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for antimicrobial classes, and genomic associations with resistance phenotypes. One-hundred clinical MRSA isolates were selected, representing the ten most common ST clones determined by national surveillance data in Australia. MIC was determined for ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, tedizolid, dalbavancin, eravacycline, omadacycline, delafloxacin, lefamulin and vancomycin. The associations between non-susceptibility and common resistance mechanisms for the isolates were characterised by whole-genome sequencing. All isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, eravacycline, tedizolid, and vancomycin. Thirty-nine isolates, comprising all ST239, PVL-negative ST22 and ST45 isolates, eight of ten ST8 isolates and one of ten ST78 isolates, were resistant to delafloxacin (when community-acquired-pneumonia site-specific breakpoints were applied). One isolate of ST239 was resistant to lefamulin, and two isolates of ST1 had elevated omadacycline MIC. There was a correlation between delafloxacin non-susceptibility and known associated mutations. Newer Gram-positive antimicrobial agents, apart from delafloxacin, demonstrate good in vitro activity against Australian MRSA STs. Susceptibility testing prior to use of delafloxacin, lefamulin and omadacycline should be considered. When the use of these agents becomes commonplace, ongoing monitoring for resistance is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pathology
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2025.11.010
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In vitro activity of recently introduced Gram-positive-specific antimicrobial agents against Australian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Rebecca Sparks, Menuk B. Jayawardena, Matthew VN O'Sullivan, Jonathan R. Iredell et al.
Pathology
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

In vitro activity of recently introduced Gram-positive-specific antimicrobial agents against Australian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Rebecca Sparks, Menuk B. Jayawardena, Matthew VN O'Sullivan, Jonathan R. Iredell, Andrew N. Ginn, Jenny Draper, Elena Martinez, Indy Sandaradura, Qinning Wang
article en

Abstract

Existing therapeutic options are limited for severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Newer antimicrobials with anti-MRSA activity have been introduced, but evaluation of pre-existing resistance in the Australian setting is limited. Our objectives are to characterise the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the common MRSA sequence types (STs) in Australia relating to newer antimicrobial agents to determine the association between non-susceptibility and ST, trends in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for antimicrobial classes, and genomic associations with resistance phenotypes. One-hundred clinical MRSA isolates were selected, representing the ten most common ST clones determined by national surveillance data in Australia. MIC was determined for ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, tedizolid, dalbavancin, eravacycline, omadacycline, delafloxacin, lefamulin and vancomycin. The associations between non-susceptibility and common resistance mechanisms for the isolates were characterised by whole-genome sequencing. All isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, eravacycline, tedizolid, and vancomycin. Thirty-nine isolates, comprising all ST239, PVL-negative ST22 and ST45 isolates, eight of ten ST8 isolates and one of ten ST78 isolates, were resistant to delafloxacin (when community-acquired-pneumonia site-specific breakpoints were applied). One isolate of ST239 was resistant to lefamulin, and two isolates of ST1 had elevated omadacycline MIC. There was a correlation between delafloxacin non-susceptibility and known associated mutations. Newer Gram-positive antimicrobial agents, apart from delafloxacin, demonstrate good in vitro activity against Australian MRSA STs. Susceptibility testing prior to use of delafloxacin, lefamulin and omadacycline should be considered. When the use of these agents becomes commonplace, ongoing monitoring for resistance is recommended.

PathologyVol. 58(3)
New South Wales Department of Health (AU), Westmead Hospital (AU), Westmead Institute for Medical Research (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.