The Impact of Greater Auricular Nerve Injury in Parotidectomy: A Narrative Review of Sensory Outcomes and Quality of Life

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Postoperative sensory loss is a frequent morbidity following parotidectomy, yet the necessity of preserving the greater auricular nerve (GAN) during parotidectomy remains debated. While some surgeons prioritize nerve sacrifice for better oncological exposure, others advocate for preservation to maintain quality of life (QoL). This narrative review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence regarding the impact of GAN sacrifice on objective sensory modalities, subjective disturbances, and long-term QoL. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was performed (January 2000-August 2025). Twenty studies, including RCTs and cohorts, were reviewed to synthesize evidence on objective sensory modalities and patient-reported outcomes. Sensory assessments (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, VAS, and two-point discrimination) and the POI-8 QoL questionnaire were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> GAN preservation, particularly of the lobular branch, is associated with better early sensory recovery (1-6 months). In the long term (>12 months), although the sensory gap narrows between groups, the sacrifice group exhibits significantly higher rates of persistent anesthesia in localized regions, notably the earlobe. Regarding QoL, while global scores often show no significant long-term differences, 35% of patients with GAN sacrifice continue to experience functional limitations in specific activities, such as telephone use or wearing earrings. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although patients demonstrate adaptation to sensory loss, GAN preservation offers potential benefits in daily function and comfort; thus, it is advised when oncologically feasible. To overcome the high heterogeneity in current evidence, future multicenter trials utilizing unified objective measurements on predefined regions of interest are necessary to further clarify the functional benefits of nerve preservation and establish definitive surgical guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031294
Primary Topic
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Greater Auricular Nerve Injury in Parotidectomy: A Narrative Review of Sensory Outcomes and Quality of Life

Keon-Ha Kim, Heechun Cho, Sang Hoo Park, Nayeon Choi et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
article

The Impact of Greater Auricular Nerve Injury in Parotidectomy: A Narrative Review of Sensory Outcomes and Quality of Life

Keon-Ha Kim, Heechun Cho, Sang Hoo Park, Nayeon Choi, Heejun Yi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Postoperative sensory loss is a frequent morbidity following parotidectomy, yet the necessity of preserving the greater auricular nerve (GAN) during parotidectomy remains debated. While some surgeons prioritize nerve sacrifice for better oncological exposure, others advocate for preservation to maintain quality of life (QoL). This narrative review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence regarding the impact of GAN sacrifice on objective sensory modalities, subjective disturbances, and long-term QoL. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was performed (January 2000-August 2025). Twenty studies, including RCTs and cohorts, were reviewed to synthesize evidence on objective sensory modalities and patient-reported outcomes. Sensory assessments (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, VAS, and two-point discrimination) and the POI-8 QoL questionnaire were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> GAN preservation, particularly of the lobular branch, is associated with better early sensory recovery (1-6 months). In the long term (>12 months), although the sensory gap narrows between groups, the sacrifice group exhibits significantly higher rates of persistent anesthesia in localized regions, notably the earlobe. Regarding QoL, while global scores often show no significant long-term differences, 35% of patients with GAN sacrifice continue to experience functional limitations in specific activities, such as telephone use or wearing earrings. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although patients demonstrate adaptation to sensory loss, GAN preservation offers potential benefits in daily function and comfort; thus, it is advised when oncologically feasible. To overcome the high heterogeneity in current evidence, future multicenter trials utilizing unified objective measurements on predefined regions of interest are necessary to further clarify the functional benefits of nerve preservation and establish definitive surgical guidelines.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(3)
Samsung Medical Center (KR), Jeju National University Hospital (KR), Jeju National University (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.