Exploring Sex and Clinical Factors Associated with Long-Term Survival After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A 10-Year Cohort Study

<b>Background</b>: Sex-related differences in outcomes after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation remain incompletely understood. Although women receive ICDs less frequently, whether their long-term survival differs from that of men in real-world clinical practice is not well established. We aimed to evaluate sex-specific mortality and relative survival in a large consecutive cohort of ICD recipients from a tertiary hospital. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantation at a tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2025. Demographic features, device indication, and mortality were obtained through clinical records. Relative survival (observed vs. expected) was estimated using the Ederer II method with national life tables. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed the effect of sex on mortality. <b>Results</b>: A total of 1091 patients (82.1% men; mean age 63.1 ± 13.1 years) were included. During a mean follow-up of 4.33 ± 3.22 years, 230 patients died (21.1%). Women showed lower unadjusted all-cause mortality than men: 24 deaths (18.0%) vs. 206 (20.6%). Women had significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (41.5 ± 23.6% vs. 37.2 ± 18.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.0046), less ischemic cardiomyopathy, and lower prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Although univariable analysis suggested lower mortality in women (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.90; <i>p</i> = 0.014), multivariable analysis indicated that sex was not an independent predictor of mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.53-1.26). Relative survival revealed a substantial long-term mortality burden in ICD carriers, especially in men: men: 4-year survival 82.3% (expected 93.2%); 8-year 66.7% (85.6%); 12-year 56.0% (76.8%); women: 4-year survival 89.1% (expected 96.7%); 8-year 77.1% (92.8%); 12-year 77.1% (89.2%). <b>Conclusions</b>: In this large real-world cohort of ICD recipients, women showed lower unadjusted mortality and a smaller excess mortality compared with the general population. However, sex was not an independent predictor of survival after multivariable adjustment. These findings may indicate that observed survival differences are largely explained by differences in clinical profile and comorbidity burden rather than by sex itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031275
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Sex and Clinical Factors Associated with Long-Term Survival After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A 10-Year Cohort Study

Rodrigo Di Massa, Daniel Garcı́a, José M. Rubín, Rebeca Lorca et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Exploring Sex and Clinical Factors Associated with Long-Term Survival After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A 10-Year Cohort Study

Rodrigo Di Massa, Daniel Garcı́a, José M. Rubín, Rebeca Lorca, Alberto Alén, María Ángeles Vaz Salgado, Rut Álvarez-Velasco, Cristina Helguera, Rosana González-Mesa, Francisco González-Urbistondo, Paula Bouzón
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Sex-related differences in outcomes after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation remain incompletely understood. Although women receive ICDs less frequently, whether their long-term survival differs from that of men in real-world clinical practice is not well established. We aimed to evaluate sex-specific mortality and relative survival in a large consecutive cohort of ICD recipients from a tertiary hospital. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantation at a tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2025. Demographic features, device indication, and mortality were obtained through clinical records. Relative survival (observed vs. expected) was estimated using the Ederer II method with national life tables. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed the effect of sex on mortality. <b>Results</b>: A total of 1091 patients (82.1% men; mean age 63.1 ± 13.1 years) were included. During a mean follow-up of 4.33 ± 3.22 years, 230 patients died (21.1%). Women showed lower unadjusted all-cause mortality than men: 24 deaths (18.0%) vs. 206 (20.6%). Women had significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (41.5 ± 23.6% vs. 37.2 ± 18.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.0046), less ischemic cardiomyopathy, and lower prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Although univariable analysis suggested lower mortality in women (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.90; <i>p</i> = 0.014), multivariable analysis indicated that sex was not an independent predictor of mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.53-1.26). Relative survival revealed a substantial long-term mortality burden in ICD carriers, especially in men: men: 4-year survival 82.3% (expected 93.2%); 8-year 66.7% (85.6%); 12-year 56.0% (76.8%); women: 4-year survival 89.1% (expected 96.7%); 8-year 77.1% (92.8%); 12-year 77.1% (89.2%). <b>Conclusions</b>: In this large real-world cohort of ICD recipients, women showed lower unadjusted mortality and a smaller excess mortality compared with the general population. However, sex was not an independent predictor of survival after multivariable adjustment. These findings may indicate that observed survival differences are largely explained by differences in clinical profile and comorbidity burden rather than by sex itself.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(3)
Universidad de Oviedo (ES), Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES), Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.