Embedded injustice under the developmental state: Taiwan's reflexive governance on just transition

Taiwan has incorporated just transition into net zero governance, but implementation proceeds through institutions shaped by developmental state industrialization. This study examines how labor and environmental movements contributed to legal development and how unresolved legacies shape a just energy transition. It combines thematic and doctrinal legal analysis with a purposive comparison of ten labor and ten environmental cases, including one negative institutional comparator, and six net zero transition cases: the carbon fee, high carbon industrial dependence, worker and regional support, fishery–solar co-location, offshore wind, and geothermal development. Historical cases indicate that protections often strengthened only after collective action exposed occupational, livelihood, pollution, and territorial harms. Reforms expanded rights and administrative review, yet responsibilities remained fragmented, remedies delayed, and red–green relations weakly institutionalized. Similar tensions are visible in net zero policy: carbon fee design affords regulated firms adjustment flexibility without equivalent worker or regional safeguards, while renewable energy siting addresses livelihood and territorial claims mainly through permitting, consultation, and compensation. Because the carbon fee is recent, estimates identify structural exposure rather than observed employment or regional effects. The analysis develops brown economy dependence, the sacrifice system, and hidden and delayed governance as mechanisms through which accumulated harms become normalized in legal categories, administrative routines, and development priorities. Embedded injustice reveals how accumulated harms condition net zero governance, sensitizes just transition policy to these legacies, and supports cautious comparison across sectors and developmental state contexts. Reflexive governance in Taiwan therefore requires earlier coordination and revisable decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115553
Primary Topic
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embedded injustice under the developmental state: Taiwan's reflexive governance on just transition

Kuei Tien Chou, Jui-Ning Chang
Energy Policy
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
article

Embedded injustice under the developmental state: Taiwan's reflexive governance on just transition

Kuei Tien Chou, Jui-Ning Chang
article en

Abstract

Taiwan has incorporated just transition into net zero governance, but implementation proceeds through institutions shaped by developmental state industrialization. This study examines how labor and environmental movements contributed to legal development and how unresolved legacies shape a just energy transition. It combines thematic and doctrinal legal analysis with a purposive comparison of ten labor and ten environmental cases, including one negative institutional comparator, and six net zero transition cases: the carbon fee, high carbon industrial dependence, worker and regional support, fishery–solar co-location, offshore wind, and geothermal development. Historical cases indicate that protections often strengthened only after collective action exposed occupational, livelihood, pollution, and territorial harms. Reforms expanded rights and administrative review, yet responsibilities remained fragmented, remedies delayed, and red–green relations weakly institutionalized. Similar tensions are visible in net zero policy: carbon fee design affords regulated firms adjustment flexibility without equivalent worker or regional safeguards, while renewable energy siting addresses livelihood and territorial claims mainly through permitting, consultation, and compensation. Because the carbon fee is recent, estimates identify structural exposure rather than observed employment or regional effects. The analysis develops brown economy dependence, the sacrifice system, and hidden and delayed governance as mechanisms through which accumulated harms become normalized in legal categories, administrative routines, and development priorities. Embedded injustice reveals how accumulated harms condition net zero governance, sensitizes just transition policy to these legacies, and supports cautious comparison across sectors and developmental state contexts. Reflexive governance in Taiwan therefore requires earlier coordination and revisable decisions.

Energy PolicyVol. 219
National Taiwan University (TW)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Embedded injustice under the developmental state: Taiwan's reflexive governance on just transition — Kuei Tien Chou, Jui-Ning Chang · Energy Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS