Longitudinal assessment of respiratory status utilising the amended Great Ormond Street Respiratory Score in treated spinal muscular atrophy type 1 children

Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 phenotypes have changed since the introduction of disease modifying therapies. The Great Ormond Respiratory Score has been used to assess respiratory function in children with spinal muscular atrophy. This paper presents an updated version of the score and aims to describe preliminary data reviewing the two-year changes of respiratory status in a cohort of spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients treated with monotherapy or sequential disease modifying treatments. Patients were assessed using the amended Great Ormond Respiratory score at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. 59 patients were reviewed. In total, 32 first initiated nusinersen therapy, 16 first initiated onasemnogene abeparvovec and 11 first initiated risdiplam therapy. There was a significant difference in baseline Great Ormond Respiratory Score between the nusinersen group and the onasemnogene abeparvovec group (p = 0.002). Risdiplam data is limited and is identified as preliminary. The data identifies treatment prior to 6 weeks of age stabilise at a lower score, with this being impacted by age of treatment. Those treated after one year show worse scores but stabilise. Despite the switching between disease modifying treatments, the Great Ormond Respiratory Score is a useful and easy-to-use clinical outcome measure which can demonstrate change in respiratory status over longitudinal review.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuromuscular Disorders
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2026.106368
Primary Topic
Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal assessment of respiratory status utilising the amended Great Ormond Street Respiratory Score in treated spinal muscular atrophy type 1 children

F Muntoni, Chan Joshua E, Baranello G, Stimpson G et al.
Neuromuscular Disorders
Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
article

Longitudinal assessment of respiratory status utilising the amended Great Ormond Street Respiratory Score in treated spinal muscular atrophy type 1 children

F Muntoni, Chan Joshua E, Baranello G, Stimpson G, Scoto M, Edel L, Patelis V
article en

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 phenotypes have changed since the introduction of disease modifying therapies. The Great Ormond Respiratory Score has been used to assess respiratory function in children with spinal muscular atrophy. This paper presents an updated version of the score and aims to describe preliminary data reviewing the two-year changes of respiratory status in a cohort of spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients treated with monotherapy or sequential disease modifying treatments. Patients were assessed using the amended Great Ormond Respiratory score at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. 59 patients were reviewed. In total, 32 first initiated nusinersen therapy, 16 first initiated onasemnogene abeparvovec and 11 first initiated risdiplam therapy. There was a significant difference in baseline Great Ormond Respiratory Score between the nusinersen group and the onasemnogene abeparvovec group (p = 0.002). Risdiplam data is limited and is identified as preliminary. The data identifies treatment prior to 6 weeks of age stabilise at a lower score, with this being impacted by age of treatment. Those treated after one year show worse scores but stabilise. Despite the switching between disease modifying treatments, the Great Ormond Respiratory Score is a useful and easy-to-use clinical outcome measure which can demonstrate change in respiratory status over longitudinal review.

Neuromuscular DisordersVol. 61
Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.